Beyea Jan, Hatch Maureen, Stellman Steven D, Santella Regina M, Teitelbaum Susan L, Prokopczyk Bogdan, Camann David, Gammon Marilie D
Consulting in the Public Interest, Lambertville, New Jersey, USA.
Environ Health Perspect. 2006 Jul;114(7):1053-8. doi: 10.1289/ehp.8659.
We previously developed a historical reconstruction model to estimate exposure to airborne polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) from traffic back to 1960 for use in case-control studies of breast cancer risk. Here we report the results of four exercises to validate and calibrate the model.
Model predictions of benzo[a]pyrene (BaP) concentration in soil and carpet dust were tested against measurements collected at subjects' homes at interview. In addition, predictions of air intake of BaP were compared with blood PAH-DNA adducts. These same soil, carpet, and blood measurements were used for model optimization. In a separate test of the meteorological dispersion part of the model, predictions of hourly concentrations of carbon monoxide from traffic were compared with data collected at a U.S. Environmental Protection Agency monitoring station.
The data for soil, PAH-DNA adducts, and carbon monoxide concentrations were all consistent with model predictions. The carpet dust data were inconsistent, suggesting possible spatial confounding with PAH-containing contamination tracked in from outdoors or unmodeled cooking sources. BaP was found proportional to other PAHs in our soil and dust data, making it reasonable to use BaP historical data as a surrogate for other PAHs. Road intersections contributed 40-80% of both total emissions and average exposures, suggesting that the repertoire of simple markers of exposure, such as traffic counts and/or distance to nearest road, needs to be expanded to include distance to nearest intersection.
我们之前开发了一种历史重建模型,用于估算自1960年以来交通源空气中多环芳烃(PAHs)的暴露情况,以用于乳腺癌风险的病例对照研究。在此,我们报告四项验证和校准该模型的实验结果。
将土壤和地毯灰尘中苯并[a]芘(BaP)浓度的模型预测值与访谈时在受试者家中采集的测量值进行对比。此外,将BaP的空气摄入量预测值与血液中的PAH-DNA加合物进行比较。这些相同的土壤、地毯和血液测量值用于模型优化。在对模型的气象扩散部分进行的单独测试中,将交通源一氧化碳每小时浓度的预测值与美国环境保护局监测站收集的数据进行比较。
土壤、PAH-DNA加合物和一氧化碳浓度的数据均与模型预测结果一致。地毯灰尘数据不一致,这表明可能存在来自室外追踪到的含PAH污染物或未建模的烹饪源的空间混杂因素。在我们的土壤和灰尘数据中发现BaP与其他PAHs成比例,因此使用BaP历史数据作为其他PAHs的替代物是合理的。道路交叉口贡献了总排放量和平均暴露量的40%-80%,这表明暴露的简单标志物(如交通流量和/或到最近道路的距离)需要扩展,以纳入到最近交叉口的距离。