Itani Lina Y, Cherry Mohamad A, Araj George F
Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon.
J Med Liban. 2005 Oct-Dec;53(4):208-12.
Rapid detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB), especially multidrug-resistant strains, is of importance for prompt clinical management and initiation of public health control measures. Culture remains the "gold" standard in the confirmatory laboratory diagnosis of mycobacterial infections. The reliability of the automated radiometric BACTEC 460 TB (BACTEC) system for the rapid detection of mycobacteria in clinical specimens was evaluated and compared to the conventional culture on Lowenstein-Jensen (LJ) medium.
All clinical specimens submitted for mycobacterial culture were processed and simultaneously cultured on both BACTEC broth medium and LJ solid medium. Acid-fast bacilli (AFB) smears were also performed on the sediments. Differentiation of mycobacterial isolates as MTB or Mycobacterium sp. other than tuberculosis (MOTT) was based on the BACTEC NAP test. All positive culture findings recovered between January 1997 and December 2003 were analyzed in this study.
A total of 3300 specimens were tested of which 355 (10.7%) yielded positive cultures consisting of 233 (65.6%) MTB and 122 (34.4%) MOTT. The percentages of AFB smear-positive were 45% and 49% in clinical specimens yielding MTB & MOTT, respectively. Though several types of specimens were cultured, most isolates (72% of MTB & 91% of MOTT) were recovered from respiratory specimens. Overall, the BACTEC showed significantly higher mycobacteria recovery rate (91%) than LJ (77%). In terms of times to detection, BACTEC showed significantly shorter detection time of isolates than LJ for the overall (mean 9.6 days for BACTEC vs. 22.8 days for LJ) and for each category of AFB smear finding. The detection time is shortened for BACTEC with the increasing grade of smear positivity.
BACTEC is substantially more sensitive, efficient and rapid than LJ in the laboratory diagnosis of mycobacterial infections. This system also provides rapid differentiation of MTB from MOTT and susceptibility test results on MTB. However, the simultaneous use of BACTEC and LJ is recommended to provide maximum optimal recovery of isolates from clinical specimens. The time-saving in BACTEC provides an excellent facility for physicians in patient management and to public health personnel for prompt initiation of infection control measures.
快速检测结核分枝杆菌(MTB),尤其是耐多药菌株,对于及时的临床管理和启动公共卫生控制措施至关重要。培养仍然是分枝杆菌感染确诊实验室诊断的“金”标准。评估了自动放射性BACTEC 460 TB(BACTEC)系统在临床标本中快速检测分枝杆菌的可靠性,并与在罗-琴(LJ)培养基上的传统培养方法进行比较。
对所有提交进行分枝杆菌培养的临床标本进行处理,并同时在BACTEC肉汤培养基和LJ固体培养基上培养。对沉淀物也进行抗酸杆菌(AFB)涂片检查。根据BACTEC NAP试验将分枝杆菌分离株鉴定为MTB或非结核分枝杆菌(MOTT)。本研究分析了1997年1月至2003年12月期间所有阳性培养结果。
共检测了3300份标本,其中355份(10.7%)培养结果为阳性,包括233份(65.6%)MTB和122份(34.4%)MOTT。在培养出MTB和MOTT的临床标本中,AFB涂片阳性率分别为45%和49%。尽管培养了几种类型的标本,但大多数分离株(MTB的72%和MOTT的91%)来自呼吸道标本。总体而言,BACTEC显示出的分枝杆菌回收率(91%)显著高于LJ(77%)。在检测时间方面,BACTEC显示出分离株的检测时间总体上(BACTEC平均为9.6天,LJ为22.8天)以及对于每类AFB涂片结果均显著短于LJ。随着涂片阳性等级的增加,BACTEC的检测时间缩短。
在分枝杆菌感染的实验室诊断中,BACTEC比LJ更敏感、高效和快速。该系统还能快速区分MTB和MOTT,并提供MTB的药敏试验结果。然而,建议同时使用BACTEC和LJ,以从临床标本中最大程度地优化分离株的回收率。BACTEC节省时间,为医生进行患者管理以及公共卫生人员及时启动感染控制措施提供了极好的便利。