正畸粘结用自酸蚀与传统粘结剂的体外剪切粘结强度

In-vitro shear bond strength of self-etching versus traditional adhesives for orthodontic luting.

作者信息

Holzmeier Marcus, Ernst Claus-Peter, Willershausen Brita, Hirschfelder Ursula

机构信息

Department of Orthodontics, Friedrich-Alexander University, Erlangen-Nuremberg, Germany.

出版信息

J Orofac Orthop. 2006 Jul;67(4):244-59. doi: 10.1007/s00056-006-0546-4.

DOI:10.1007/s00056-006-0546-4

PMID:16838093

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine the enamel shear bond strength (SBS) of various established (Resulcin Aqua Prime & Monobond N [RA], Prompt L-Pot III [PLP]) and experimental (AC-Bond [AC], AC-Bond + Desensitizer [ACD]) self-etching adhesives in comparison to fourth (Total Etch, Primer and Bonding have separate liquids; OptiBond FL [FL]) and fifth-generation (Total Etch, Primer and Bonding "One Bottle"; Excite [EX], Gluma Comfort Bond [CB]) adhesives.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All adhesives were applied on flattened human enamel surfaces following the manufacturers' instructions and light-cured using a quartz-tungsten-halogen curing device. 3.5 x 2.0 mm Tetric Ceram A2 composite cylinders were sheared off (Zwick Universal-testing-machine 1445, 1 mm/min) after thermocycling (5-55 degrees C, 5000x). Normal distribution was tested for all groups and analysis of variance was conducted. The t-test (5% level, Bonferroni-correction) was used for statistical analysis to evaluate intergroup differences.

RESULTS

Shear bond strength in enamel: Resulcin Aqua Prime & Monobond N: 27.0 +/- 5.8 MPa, Prompt L-Pop III: 15.9 +/- 3.4 MPa, AC-Bond: 28.1 +/- 4.4 MPa, AC-Bond + Desensitizer: 22.2 +/- 4.1 MPa, OptiBond FL: 33.2 +/- 3.2 MPa, Excite: 30.5 +/- 5.1 MPa, Gluma Comfort Bond: 30.1 +/- 3.7 MPa. OptiBond FL demonstrated significantly higher SBS (p < 0.002) in enamel than Resulcin Aqua Prime & Monobond N, AC-Bond, AC-Bond + Desensitizer and Prompt L-Pop III. Resulcin Aqua Prime & Monobond N performed significantly better than Prompt L-Pop III, but did not differ from AC-Bond or AC-Bond + Desensitizer. The SBS values of Excite and Gluma Comfort Bond were both on the same level of significance as AC-Bond and Resulcin Aqua Prime & Monobond N, but the former showed superior results to AC-Bond + Desensitizer and Prompt L-Pop III. Prompt L-Pop III yielded significantly lower SBS-values than all the other products evaluated.

CONCLUSION

Resulcin Aqua Prime & Monobond N and AC-Bond did not differ significantly from established 5th-generation products. Further in-vivo studies are required to investigate intra-oral stability and resistance against changing forces and force directions.

摘要

目的

测定各种已确立的（Resulcin Aqua Prime和Monobond N [RA]、Prompt L-Pot III [PLP]）和实验性的（AC-Bond [AC]、AC-Bond +脱敏剂[ACD]）自酸蚀粘结剂的釉质剪切粘结强度（SBS），并与第四代（全酸蚀，底漆和粘结剂有单独液体；OptiBond FL [FL]）和第五代（全酸蚀，底漆和粘结剂“一瓶装”；Excite [EX]、Gluma Comfort Bond [CB]）粘结剂进行比较。

材料与方法

按照制造商的说明，将所有粘结剂应用于平整的人釉质表面，并用石英-钨-卤素固化装置进行光固化。在热循环（5-55℃，5000次）后，将3.5×2.0 mm的Tetric Ceram A2复合圆柱体剪切下来（Zwick万能试验机1445，1 mm/min）。对所有组进行正态分布检验，并进行方差分析。采用t检验（5%水平，Bonferroni校正）进行统计分析，以评估组间差异。

结果

釉质中的剪切粘结强度：Resulcin Aqua Prime和Monobond N：27.0±5.8 MPa，Prompt L-Pop III：15.9±3.4 MPa，AC-Bond：28.1±4.4 MPa，AC-Bond +脱敏剂：22.2±4.1 MPa，OptiBond FL：33.2±3.2 MPa，Excite：30.5±5.1 MPa，Gluma Comfort Bond：30.1±3.7 MPa。OptiBond FL在釉质中的SBS显著高于Resulcin Aqua Prime和Monobond N、AC-Bond、AC-Bond +脱敏剂和Prompt L-Pop III（p < 0.002）。Resulcin Aqua Prime和Monobond N的性能明显优于Prompt L-Pop III，但与AC-Bond或AC-Bond +脱敏剂没有差异。Excite和Gluma Comfort Bond的SBS值与AC-Bond和Resulcin Aqua Prime和Monobond N处于同一显著水平，但前者的结果优于AC-Bond +脱敏剂和Prompt L-Pop III。Prompt L-Pop III产生的SBS值明显低于所有其他评估产品。