Winickoff David E
Department of Environmental Science, Policy and Management, 115 Giannini Hall, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA.
Trends Biotechnol. 2006 Sep;24(9):390-4. doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2006.06.010. Epub 2006 Jul 14.
Owing to the restrictive human embryonic stem cell (hESC) policies of the US government, the question of whether to pursue human embryonic stem cell experiments has dominated the ethical and political discourse concerning such research. Explicit attention must now turn to problems of implementing the research on a large scale: in the 2004 US elections, California voters approved a state initiative for stem cell research, earmarking $3 billion in direct spending over 10 years. This article explores three ethical and political problem areas emerging out of the California program, the resolution of which will help set the trajectory of hESC research in the US and abroad, and then proposes an institutional approach to help address them: a network of public stem cell banks in the US that feature transparent and shared governance.
由于美国政府对人类胚胎干细胞(hESC)的限制政策,是否进行人类胚胎干细胞实验的问题主导了有关此类研究的伦理和政治讨论。现在必须明确关注大规模开展该研究的问题:在2004年美国大选中,加利福尼亚州选民批准了一项干细胞研究的州倡议,指定在10年内直接支出30亿美元。本文探讨了加利福尼亚州该计划中出现的三个伦理和政治问题领域,这些问题的解决将有助于确定美国及其他国家hESC研究的轨迹,然后提出一种制度方法来帮助解决这些问题:在美国建立一个具有透明和共享治理特点的公共干细胞库网络。