Tierney Emily, Kimball Alexa Boer
Department of Internal Medicine, Tufts University School of Medicine.
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2006 Aug;55(2):213-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2006.01.044. Epub 2006 May 11.
The perception that dermatologists in practice have substantially higher incomes than in academics is often cited as the primary reason people choose to practice outside academic institutions.
We sought to compare the incomes of dermatologists in academics versus various practice settings.
Data from various surveys of dermatologists from 2002 to 2004 were adjusted for annual inflation to the year 2004 and compared. Benefits and bonuses were not included. The income level of clinical instructors, who are 7.0% of all academic dermatology faculty, were not available for inclusion.
Median dermatology faculty income (combined average of assistant, associate, and professor levels) was 192,267 dollars, 12.0% less than the median practice income of 215,303 dollars. There was substantial variation across regions, institutions, and types of nonacademic practice. Median starting incomes for dermatology residency graduates were comparable in practice across multiple data sources (182,116 dollars-200,000 dollars) and private universities (189,336 dollars); however, both were significantly higher than median starting incomes in public universities (83,349 dollars).
This study relied on self-reported data. Although all attempts were made to use comparable information, variances in how data were collected and classified may exist.
Initial income for those entering practice is equivalent to those entering academia in private universities; however, incomes for both of these groups are 2- to 3-fold higher than those entering academia in public universities. This discrepancy may discourage some recent trainees, some of whom have high debt and high expenses, from entering the field of academic dermatology. Because incomes in academia increase predictably with increasing rank, overall self-reported incomes for established dermatologists in practice and senior academia are comparable.
人们常常认为执业皮肤科医生的收入比在学术机构工作的皮肤科医生高得多,这被视为人们选择在学术机构以外的地方执业的主要原因。
我们试图比较学术机构与不同执业环境下皮肤科医生的收入。
对2002年至2004年对皮肤科医生进行的各种调查数据进行年度通货膨胀调整,使其相当于2004年的数据并进行比较。未包括福利和奖金。临床教员的收入水平未纳入分析,临床教员占所有学术皮肤科教员的7.0%。
皮肤科教员的收入中位数(助理、副教授和教授级别综合平均)为192,267美元,比执业收入中位数215,303美元低12.0%。不同地区、机构和非学术执业类型之间存在很大差异。皮肤科住院医师毕业生的起薪中位数在多个数据来源的执业环境(182,116美元至200,000美元)和私立大学(189,336美元)中相当;然而,两者均显著高于公立大学的起薪中位数(83,349美元)。
本研究依赖于自我报告的数据。尽管已尽一切努力使用可比信息,但数据收集和分类方式可能存在差异。
进入执业领域的人的初始收入与进入私立大学学术领域的人相当;然而,这两组人的收入都比进入公立大学学术领域的人高出2至3倍。这种差异可能会使一些近期的受训人员望而却步,其中一些人背负着高额债务和高额开支,从而不愿进入学术皮肤科领域。由于学术机构的收入会随着职级的提高而可预测地增加,因此执业皮肤科医生和资深学术界人士自我报告的总体收入相当。