Candilis Philip J, Martinez Richard
Department of Psychiatry, UMass Medical School, 55 Lake Avenue North, Worcester, MA 01655, USA.
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2006;34(2):242-4.
In response to a case presented by Dr. David Menkes, the authors argue for a standard of forensic practice that aspires to more than minimal requirements of ethics and law. Professional ethics for forensic experts require acknowledgment of both the duties and ideals of the profession if they are to meet societal expectations, honor the intent of legal procedure, and overcome jaundiced views of the "hired gun." Common values of transparency, truth-telling, and respect for moral relationships in professional work are suggested for analysis of this case, as are respect for the profession and its historical narrative. In fact, a robust professional ethic that requires broader consideration of personal, professional, and community values finds renewed expression in this ethical analysis.
针对大卫·门克斯博士提出的一个案例,作者主张一种法医实践标准,该标准所追求的不仅仅是道德和法律的最低要求。法医专家的职业道德要求,如果要满足社会期望、尊重法律程序的意图并克服对“雇佣枪手”的偏见看法,就需要承认该职业的职责和理想。建议将专业工作中透明度、讲真话和尊重道德关系等共同价值观用于对此案例的分析,同时也包括对该职业及其历史叙述的尊重。事实上,一种要求更广泛考虑个人、职业和社区价值观的强大职业道德在这种伦理分析中得到了新的体现。