Candilis Philip J
Law and Psychiatry Program, University of Massachusetts Medical School, 55 Lake Avenue North, Worcester, MA 01655, USA.
Psychiatr Clin North Am. 2009 Jun;32(2):423-35. doi: 10.1016/j.psc.2009.02.005.
For 5 decades modern forensic psychiatry has struggled with the seminal question of which master it serves: is it a field that answers chiefly to the law or to psychiatry? It is the law, after all, that privileges forensic experts in the courtroom, but it is psychiatry that grounds them in the medical ethics of care and cure. In reviewing the historical narrative of modern forensic ethics, this article explores whether the field has developed to the point that it is insufficient to apply legal or medical ethics alone. Rather, a more robust professionalism of broader perspectives, mixed theories, and basic ethical habits and skills may foster better understanding of the complex intersection of psychiatry and the law.
五十年来,现代法医精神病学一直在努力应对一个具有开创性的问题:它服务于哪一门学科?它主要是一个主要对法律负责还是对精神病学负责的领域?毕竟,是法律赋予了法医专家在法庭上的特权,但却是精神病学将他们置于护理和治疗的医学伦理基础之上。在回顾现代法医伦理的历史叙事时,本文探讨了该领域是否已经发展到仅应用法律或医学伦理已不足以应对的程度。相反,一种具有更广泛视角、混合理论以及基本伦理习惯和技能的更强有力的专业精神,可能会促进对精神病学与法律复杂交叉点的更好理解。