Hoffmann Udo, Pena Antonio J, Cury Ricardo C, Abbara Suhny, Ferencik Maros, Moselewski Fabian, Siebert Uwe, Brady Thomas J, Nagurney John T
Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, 165 Charles River Plaza, Suite 400, Boston, MA 02114, USA.
Radiographics. 2006 Jul-Aug;26(4):963-78; discussion 979-80. doi: 10.1148/rg.264055709.
Current strategies for the triage of patients who have chest pain but normal initial cardiac enzyme levels and nondiagnostic electrocardiograms do not permit efficient risk stratification. The potentially fatal consequences and high malpractice costs of missed acute coronary syndromes lead every year to the unnecessary hospital admission of about 2.8 million patients who present with acute chest pain in emergency departments in the United States. Most of these patients are at very low risk for an acute coronary syndrome. However, the standard clinical work-up does not provide information about the presence and extent of coronary artery disease. In most patients (80%-94%) with an acute coronary syndrome, a significant coronary artery stenosis can be detected with selective coronary angiography. High levels of diagnostic accuracy also have been established for the detection of significant coronary artery stenosis with the use of 16- and 64-section multidetector computed tomography (CT) in patients with stable angina. Preliminary data indicate that multidetector CT also can help quantify and characterize coronary atherosclerotic plaque and that the CT findings are in good agreement with those at intravascular ultrasonography. Although multidetector CT provides accurate information about the presence of coronary artery disease, large blinded observational studies are warranted to identify CT characteristics with high accuracy for diagnosis of acute coronary syndromes. Such information would enable the conduct of randomized controlled trials to determine whether the detection of coronary stenosis and plaque with multidetector CT improves triage and reduces the costs or increases the cost-effectiveness of management of acute chest pain.
对于胸痛但初始心肌酶水平正常且心电图无诊断意义的患者,目前的分诊策略无法实现有效的风险分层。急性冠状动脉综合征漏诊所带来的潜在致命后果及高昂的医疗事故成本,导致美国每年约有280万因急性胸痛就诊于急诊科的患者被不必要地收住院。这些患者中的大多数急性冠状动脉综合征风险极低。然而,标准的临床检查无法提供有关冠状动脉疾病的存在及程度的信息。在大多数(80%-94%)急性冠状动脉综合征患者中,选择性冠状动脉造影可检测到明显的冠状动脉狭窄。对于稳定型心绞痛患者,使用16层和64层多层螺旋计算机断层扫描(CT)检测明显冠状动脉狭窄也已确立了较高的诊断准确性。初步数据表明,多层螺旋CT还可帮助量化和描述冠状动脉粥样硬化斑块,且CT检查结果与血管内超声检查结果高度一致。尽管多层螺旋CT能提供有关冠状动脉疾病存在的准确信息,但仍需开展大规模的盲法观察性研究,以确定对急性冠状动脉综合征诊断具有高准确性的CT特征。此类信息将有助于开展随机对照试验,以确定多层螺旋CT检测冠状动脉狭窄和斑块是否能改善分诊、降低成本或提高急性胸痛管理的成本效益。