Voerman G E, Vollenbroek-Hutten M M R, Hermens H J
Roessingh Research and Development, Enschede, The Netherlands.
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2007 Dec;102(1):1-9. doi: 10.1007/s00421-006-0215-8. Epub 2006 Jul 15.
This study aimed at investigating whether patients with neck-shoulder complaints from different aetiologies (work-related musculo-skeletal disorders, WMSD; whiplash associated disorders, WAD) show comparable muscle activation patterns, characterised by higher activation and lower relaxation levels of the trapezius muscles compared to healthy controls. Twenty healthy controls, 21 WMSD and 20 WAD patients with non-acute neck-shoulder pain were recruited for this cross-sectional study. Surface electromyography (sEMG) recordings were performed at the upper trapezius muscles during reference contractions, standardised computer tasks (typing and unilateral stress task), and rest measurements. sEMG was continuously recorded during these measurements. Outcome measures were root mean square (RMS) to study muscle activity, and relative rest time (RRT) to study muscle relaxation. Statistical analysis comprised the bootstrap technique and Kruskall-Wallis tests. Results showed no clear evidence for abnormal muscle activation patterns in WMSD and WAD patients compared to healthy controls. However, a tendency was observed for higher RMS levels during the reference contractions and computer tasks in both patient groups compared to healthy controls, and lower RRT levels at the non-dominant side during stress. Both patient groups also showed larger variability in RMS and RRT values. This variability has more often been reported in literature and may suggest the existence of subgroups of pain patients with corresponding different muscle activation patterns not related to aetiology. Future research may focus on identifying these subgroups of patients with neck-shoulder pain.
本研究旨在调查来自不同病因(工作相关肌肉骨骼疾病,WMSD;挥鞭样损伤相关疾病,WAD)的颈肩疼痛患者是否表现出可比的肌肉激活模式,其特征为与健康对照相比,斜方肌的激活水平更高且放松水平更低。本横断面研究招募了20名健康对照、21名患有非急性颈肩疼痛的WMSD患者和20名WAD患者。在参考收缩、标准化计算机任务(打字和单侧压力任务)以及休息测量期间,对上斜方肌进行表面肌电图(sEMG)记录。在这些测量过程中持续记录sEMG。结果指标为用于研究肌肉活动的均方根(RMS)以及用于研究肌肉放松的相对休息时间(RRT)。统计分析包括自助法技术和克鲁斯卡尔 - 沃利斯检验。结果显示,与健康对照相比,WMSD和WAD患者没有明显的异常肌肉激活模式证据。然而,观察到两个患者组在参考收缩和计算机任务期间的RMS水平相较于健康对照有升高趋势,并且在压力状态下非优势侧的RRT水平较低。两个患者组在RMS和RRT值上也表现出更大的变异性。这种变异性在文献中已有更多报道,可能表明存在疼痛患者亚组,其具有与病因无关的相应不同肌肉激活模式。未来的研究可能集中于识别这些颈肩疼痛患者亚组。