Hösl Katharina, Reinold Heiko, Harvey Robert J, Müller Ulrike, Narumiya Shuh, Zeilhofer Hanns Ulrich
Institut für Experimentelle und Klinische Pharmakologie und Toxikologie, Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Fahrstrasse 17, D-91054 Erlangen, Germany.
Pain. 2006 Dec 15;126(1-3):46-53. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2006.06.011. Epub 2006 Jul 18.
Inflammation, peripheral nerve injury and chemical irritants can cause central sensitization in pain pathways. Prostaglandins produced in the CNS induce central sensitization during inflammation mainly by relieving nociceptive neurons from glycinergic inhibition. We have recently identified spinal prostaglandin E receptors of the EP2 subtype (EP2 receptors) and the glycine receptor alpha3 subunit (GlyR alpha3) as signal transduction elements involved in the generation of central inflammatory hyperalgesia. It is however still unknown to what extent inhibition of glycine receptors by PGE2 contributes to neuropathic or chemically induced pain. To address this question, we have analyzed mice deficient in the EP2 receptor (EP2-/- mice) or in the GlyR alpha3 subunit (GlyR alpha3-/- mice) using the chronic constriction injury (CCI) model of neuropathic pain and the formalin test. We found that EP2-/- mice and GlyR alpha3-/- mice develop thermal and mechanical hyperalgesia in the CCI model indistinguishable from that seen in wild-type mice. In the formalin test, EP2-/- mice, but not GlyR alpha3-/- mice, exhibited reduced nocifensive behavior. The lack of a phenotype in GlyR alpha3-/- mice together with the absence of a facilitating effect of intrathecal PGE2 on formalin-induced nociception in wild-type mice suggests that peripheral rather than spinal EP2 receptors are involved. These results indicate that inhibition of glycinergic neurotransmission by EP2 receptor activation does not contribute to pain following peripheral nerve injury or chemical irritation with formalin. Our results thus provide further evidence that inflammatory hyperalgesia and neuropathic pain involve different mechanisms of central sensitization.
炎症、外周神经损伤和化学刺激物可导致疼痛通路中的中枢敏化。中枢神经系统中产生的前列腺素在炎症过程中主要通过解除伤害性神经元的甘氨酸能抑制来诱导中枢敏化。我们最近确定脊髓中EP2亚型的前列腺素E受体(EP2受体)和甘氨酸受体α3亚基(GlyRα3)是参与中枢性炎症性痛觉过敏产生的信号转导元件。然而,PGE2对甘氨酸受体的抑制在多大程度上导致神经性疼痛或化学诱导性疼痛仍不清楚。为了解决这个问题,我们使用神经性疼痛的慢性压迫损伤(CCI)模型和福尔马林试验分析了缺乏EP2受体的小鼠(EP2-/-小鼠)或缺乏GlyRα3亚基的小鼠(GlyRα3-/-小鼠)。我们发现,在CCI模型中,EP2-/-小鼠和GlyRα3-/-小鼠出现的热痛觉过敏和机械性痛觉过敏与野生型小鼠无异。在福尔马林试验中,EP2-/-小鼠而非GlyRα3-/-小鼠表现出伤害性防御行为减少。GlyRα3-/-小鼠缺乏表型以及鞘内注射PGE2对野生型小鼠福尔马林诱导的伤害感受无促进作用,这表明外周而非脊髓EP2受体参与其中。这些结果表明,EP2受体激活对甘氨酸能神经传递的抑制在周围神经损伤或福尔马林化学刺激后并不导致疼痛。因此,我们的结果进一步证明炎症性痛觉过敏和神经性疼痛涉及不同的中枢敏化机制。