Li Destri Giovanni, Lanteri Raffaele, Santangelo Marco, Torrisi Benedetto, Di Cataldo Antonio, Puleo Stefano
Department of Surgical Sciences, Organ Transplantations and Advanced Technologies University of Catania, Via Santa Sofia 36, 95123, Catania, Italy.
World J Surg. 2006 Aug;30(8):1494-9. doi: 10.1007/s00268-005-0698-1.
Twenty-five percent of radically treated colorectal cancer patients already have occult hepatic metastases (OHM) that will later be observed during postoperative follow-up. Instrumental examinations, i.e., intraoperative ultrasound or Doppler perfusion index, have not improved diagnosis. As carcinoembyonic antigen (CEA) levels are useful to reveal hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer, determination of CEA in the bile rather than the blood may allow preclinical diagnosis of OHM thanks to the reduced volume of bile.
One hundred radically treated colorectal cancer patients were enrolled in the study. Bile was withdrawn from the gallbladder intraoperatively and biliary CEA levels determined using an immuno-enzymatic method (normal value 0-5 ng/ml). Eighty-nine fully evaluable patients were followed up for three years postoperatively to monitor hepatic metastases. Preoperative blood CEA, lymph node metastases and biliary CEA were compared in order to assess which procedure was more efficient in identifying patients who would develop hepatic metastases.
Eleven of the 89 evaluable patients developed hepatic metastases: 9/11 presented elevated biliary CEA levels (mean: 12.73; range: 5.1-26.2); 8/11 had high preoperative blood CEA values; and 9/11 were at anatomopathological stage N+. In the 78 patients who did not develop hepatic metastases, biliary CEA was within normal limits in 73/78, preoperative blood CEA was normal in 60/78, and 58/78 patients were at anatomopathological stage N-. Hence, the sensitivity of biliary CEA was 81.8%, specificity was 93.6%, and diagnostic accuracy was 92.1%.
Determination of biliary CEA seems to be more efficient in identifying patients presenting OHM who require frequent clinical examinations or adjuvant cancer treatment.
接受根治性治疗的结直肠癌患者中有25%已存在隐匿性肝转移(OHM),这些转移灶随后会在术后随访期间被发现。诸如术中超声或多普勒灌注指数等仪器检查并未改善诊断效果。由于癌胚抗原(CEA)水平有助于揭示结直肠癌的肝转移情况,鉴于胆汁量较少,测定胆汁而非血液中的CEA可能有助于OHM的临床前诊断。
100例接受根治性治疗的结直肠癌患者纳入本研究。术中从胆囊抽取胆汁,采用免疫酶法测定胆汁CEA水平(正常值0 - 5 ng/ml)。89例可进行全面评估的患者术后随访3年以监测肝转移情况。比较术前血液CEA、淋巴结转移情况和胆汁CEA,以评估哪种方法在识别可能发生肝转移的患者方面更有效。
89例可评估患者中有11例发生肝转移:9/11患者胆汁CEA水平升高(均值:12.73;范围:5.1 - 26.2);8/11患者术前血液CEA值较高;9/11患者处于解剖病理学N +期。在未发生肝转移的78例患者中,73/78患者胆汁CEA在正常范围内,60/78患者术前血液CEA正常,58/78患者处于解剖病理学N -期。因此,胆汁CEA的敏感性为81.8%,特异性为93.6%,诊断准确性为92.1%。
测定胆汁CEA在识别需要频繁临床检查或辅助癌症治疗的OHM患者方面似乎更有效。