Berg Wendie A, Weinberg Irving N, Narayanan Deepa, Lobrano Mary E, Ross Eric, Amodei Laura, Tafra Lorraine, Adler Lee P, Uddo Joseph, Stein William, Levine Edward A
American Radiology Services, Johns Hopkins Green Spring, Lutherville, Maryland 21093, USA.
Breast J. 2006 Jul-Aug;12(4):309-23. doi: 10.1111/j.1075-122X.2006.00269.x.
We sought to prospectively assess the diagnostic performance of a high-resolution positron emission tomography (PET) scanner using mild breast compression (positron emission mammography [PEM]). Data were collected on concomitant medical conditions to assess potential confounding factors. At four centers, 94 consecutive women with known breast cancer or suspicious breast lesions received 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) intravenously, followed by PEM scans. Readers were provided clinical histories and x-ray mammograms (when available). After excluding inevaluable cases and two cases of lymphoma, PEM readings were correlated with histopathology for 92 lesions in 77 women: 77 index lesions (42 malignant), 3 ipsilateral lesions (3 malignant), and 12 contralateral lesions (3 malignant). Of 48 cancers, 16 (33%) were clinically evident; 11 (23%) were ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), and 37 (77%) were invasive (30 ductal, 4 lobular, and 3 mixed; median size 21 mm). PEM depicted 10 of 11 (91%) DCIS and 33 of 37 (89%) invasive cancers. PEM was positive in 1 of 2 T1a tumors, 4 of 6 T1b tumors, 7 of 7 T1c tumors, and 4 of 4 cases where tumor size was not available (e.g., no surgical follow-up). PEM sensitivity for detecting cancer was 90%, specificity 86%, positive predictive value (PPV) 88%, negative predictive value (NPV) 88%, accuracy 88%, and area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (Az) 0.918. In three patients, cancer foci were identified only on PEM, significantly changing patient management. Excluding eight diabetic subjects and eight subjects whose lesions were characterized as clearly benign with conventional imaging, PEM sensitivity was 91%, specificity 93%, PPV 95%, NPV 88%, accuracy 92%, and Az 0.949 when interpreted with mammographic and clinical findings. FDG PEM has high diagnostic accuracy for breast lesions, including DCIS.
我们试图前瞻性地评估使用轻度乳房压迫的高分辨率正电子发射断层扫描(PET)扫描仪(正电子发射乳腺断层摄影术[PEM])的诊断性能。收集了伴随疾病的数据以评估潜在的混杂因素。在四个中心,94名患有已知乳腺癌或可疑乳腺病变的连续女性静脉注射18F-氟脱氧葡萄糖(FDG),随后进行PEM扫描。向阅片者提供了临床病史和X线乳房造影照片(如有)。在排除不可评估的病例和2例淋巴瘤病例后,对77名女性的92个病变进行了PEM读数与组织病理学的相关性分析:77个索引病变(42个恶性)、3个同侧病变(3个恶性)和12个对侧病变(3个恶性)。在48例癌症中,16例(33%)临床可见;11例(23%)为原位导管癌(DCIS),37例(77%)为浸润性癌(30例导管癌、4例小叶癌和3例混合型;中位大小21mm)。PEM显示11例DCIS中的10例(91%)和37例浸润性癌中的33例(89%)。PEM在2例T1a肿瘤中的1例、6例T1b肿瘤中的4例、7例T1c肿瘤中的7例以及4例肿瘤大小未知(如无手术随访)的病例中呈阳性。PEM检测癌症的敏感性为90%,特异性为86%,阳性预测值(PPV)为88%,阴性预测值(NPV)为88%,准确性为88%,受试者操作特征曲线下面积(Az)为0.918。在三名患者中,仅在PEM上发现了癌灶,显著改变了患者的治疗方案。排除八名糖尿病患者和八名病变在传统影像学上被明确判定为良性的患者后,结合乳房造影和临床检查结果进行解读时,PEM的敏感性为91%,特异性为93%,PPV为95%,NPV为88%,准确性为92%,Az为0.949。FDG PEM对包括DCIS在内的乳腺病变具有较高的诊断准确性。