Allardyce Judith, Boydell Jane
Department of Clinical Research, Crichton Royal Hospital, Dumfries DG1 4TG, Scotland.
Schizophr Bull. 2006 Oct;32(4):592-8. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbl008. Epub 2006 Jul 18.
Rates of schizophrenia differ significantly between groups defined at the social level, eg, urban/rural comparisons, neighborhoods, and ethnic minority status. While earlier studies were not able to determine if the social environment influenced the development of schizophrenia (causation) or whether individuals at risk aggregated in adverse social environments (selection), the recent development of multilevel modeling should inform this debate. To date, there are few examples of multilevel analyses in schizophrenia research; however, the small number of studies suggest that there may be a neighborhood social contextual effect that influences rates of schizophrenia and other psychotic disorders. Further research is urgently required to progress our knowledge of how individuals, their genes, and the neighborhoods they live in, interact with each other. Studies need to use well-specified multilevel models, and until then, we should remain cautious in our interpretation of such findings.
在社会层面定义的不同群体中,精神分裂症的发病率存在显著差异,例如城乡比较、社区以及少数民族身份等方面。虽然早期研究无法确定社会环境是影响了精神分裂症的发病(因果关系),还是处于患病风险的个体聚集在了不利的社会环境中(选择因素),但多层次建模的最新发展应该能为这场争论提供依据。迄今为止,精神分裂症研究中很少有多层次分析的实例;然而,少数研究表明,可能存在邻里社会背景效应会影响精神分裂症和其他精神障碍的发病率。迫切需要进一步开展研究,以增进我们对个体、其基因以及他们所居住社区之间如何相互作用的了解。研究需要使用明确的多层次模型,在此之前,我们对这些研究结果的解读应保持谨慎。