Chopra Pradeep, Smith Howard S, Deer Timothy R, Bowman Richard C
Department of Medicine Division of Biology and Medicine, Brown Medical School, Providence, RI, USA.
Pain Physician. 2005 Jan;8(1):87-100.
Percutaneous epidural adhesiolysis and spinal endoscopic adhesiolysis are interventional pain management techniques that play an active role in managing chronic intractable low back pain. There have not been any systematic reviews performed on this subject.
To evaluate the effect of percutaneous adhesiolysis and spinal endoscopic adhesiolysis in managing chronic low back and lower extremity pain.
A systematic review utilizing the methodologic quality criteria of the Cochrane Musculoskeletal Review Group for randomized trials and the criteria established by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) for evaluation of randomized and non-randomized trials.
Search identified the relevant literature, through searches of MEDLINE and EMBASE (January 1966 to November 2004), BioMed Central and Cochrane Review database. Manual searches of bibliographies of known primary and review articles, and abstracts from scientific meetings within the last 2 years, in English language. Randomized and non-randomized studies were included in the review based on the criteria established. Three reviewers independently assessed the trials for the quality of their methods. Percutaneous adhesiolysis and endoscopic adhesiolysis were analyzed separately.
Primary outcome measure was significant pain relief (50% or greater). Other outcome measures were functional improvement, improvement of psychological status, and return to work. Short-term relief was defined as less than 3 months, and long-term relief was defined as 3 months or longer.
There was strong evidence to indicate effectiveness of percutaneous epidural adhesiolysis with administration of epidural steroids for short term and long term in chronic, refractory low back pain and radicular pain. There was moderate evidence of effectiveness of addition of hypertonic saline. The evidence of effectiveness of hyaluronidase was negative. There was strong evidence to indicate effectiveness of spinal endoscopic adhesiolysis and epidural steroid administration for short-term improvement, and moderate evidence for long-term improvement in managing chronic, refractory, low back and lower extremity pain.
The evidence of effectiveness of percutaneous adhesiolysis with administration of hypertonic sodium chloride administration, and spinal endoscopic adhesiolysis with epidural steroid administration in managing chronic, refractory low back and lower extremity pain of post lumbar laminectomy syndrome or epidural fibrosis was moderate to strong.
经皮硬膜外粘连松解术和脊柱内镜粘连松解术是介入性疼痛管理技术,在慢性顽固性下腰痛的治疗中发挥着积极作用。尚未对该主题进行任何系统评价。
评估经皮粘连松解术和脊柱内镜粘连松解术治疗慢性下腰和下肢疼痛的效果。
一项系统评价,采用Cochrane肌肉骨骼评价组针对随机试验的方法学质量标准以及医疗保健研究与质量局(AHRQ)制定的评估随机和非随机试验的标准。
通过检索MEDLINE和EMBASE(1966年1月至2004年11月)、BioMed Central和Cochrane系统评价数据库来查找相关文献。人工检索已知的原始文献和综述文章的参考文献,以及过去2年科学会议的英文摘要。根据既定标准,将随机和非随机研究纳入综述。三名评审员独立评估试验方法的质量。分别对经皮粘连松解术和内镜粘连松解术进行分析。
主要结局指标是疼痛显著缓解(50%或更高)。其他结局指标包括功能改善、心理状态改善和恢复工作。短期缓解定义为少于3个月,长期缓解定义为3个月或更长时间。
有强有力的证据表明,经皮硬膜外粘连松解术联合硬膜外类固醇给药在治疗慢性顽固性下腰痛和神经根性疼痛方面短期和长期均有效。有中等证据表明添加高渗盐水有效。透明质酸酶有效性的证据为阴性。有强有力的证据表明脊柱内镜粘连松解术和硬膜外类固醇给药在短期改善方面有效,有中等证据表明在治疗慢性顽固性下腰和下肢疼痛方面长期有效。
在治疗腰椎板切除术后综合征或硬膜外纤维化引起的慢性顽固性下腰和下肢疼痛方面,经皮粘连松解术联合高渗氯化钠给药以及脊柱内镜粘连松解术联合硬膜外类固醇给药有效性的证据为中等至强。