Noparat Wilai, Siripanichakorn Kanokrat, Tribuddharat Chanwit, Danchaivijitr Somwang
Camillion Hospital, Bangkok.
J Med Assoc Thai. 2005 Dec;88 Suppl 10:S177-82.
To determine the persistence of antimicrobial effect of antiseptic solutions used in surgical hand hygiene procedure, and the in-house preparation was compared to the commercial solution for its efficacy.
The present study was performed in a 150-bed hospital involving 19 staff from general, orthopedics, KUB, and OB-GYN surgical teams in 48 operations. The antimicrobial effects from 4 different solutions were determined and compared.
The study showed that the commercial alcohol-based antiseptic solution was equally or more effective than long-time accepted povidone-iodine or chlorhexidine gluconate solutions and had better persistent effect. The in-house preparation was effective comparable to the commercial solution.
The commercial alcohol-based antiseptic solution had better persistence of antimicrobial effects compared to the in-house alcohol-based hand rub, povidone iodine and chlorhexidine gluconate.
确定外科手卫生程序中使用的抗菌溶液的抗菌效果持续性,并将自制制剂与其商业溶液的功效进行比较。
本研究在一家拥有150张床位的医院进行,涉及普通外科、骨科、泌外和妇产科手术团队的19名工作人员,共进行了48台手术。测定并比较了4种不同溶液的抗菌效果。
研究表明,市售酒精基抗菌溶液与长期使用的聚维酮碘或葡萄糖酸氯己定溶液效果相当或更有效,且具有更好的持续效果。自制制剂的效果与市售溶液相当。
与自制酒精基洗手液、聚维酮碘和葡萄糖酸氯己定相比,市售酒精基抗菌溶液具有更好的抗菌效果持续性。