Suppr超能文献

离子液体离子对中相互作用的大小和方向性:与离子电导率的关系。

Magnitude and directionality of interaction in ion pairs of ionic liquids: relationship with ionic conductivity.

作者信息

Tsuzuki Seiji, Tokuda Hiroyuki, Hayamizu Kikuko, Watanabe Masayoshi

机构信息

National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8568, Japan.

出版信息

J Phys Chem B. 2005 Sep 1;109(34):16474-81. doi: 10.1021/jp0533628.

Abstract

The intermolecular interaction energies of nine ion pairs of room temperature ionic liquids were studied by MP2/6-311G level ab initio calculations. The magnitude of the interaction energies of 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium (emim) complexes follows the trend CF(3)CO(2)(-) > BF(4)(-) > CF(3)SO(3)(-) > (CF(3)SO(2))(2)N(-) approximately PF(6)(-) (-89.8, -85.2, -82.6, -78.8, and -78.4 kcal/mol, respectively). The interaction energies of BF(4)(-) complexes with emim, ethylpyridinium (epy), N-ethyl-N,N,N-trimethylammonium ((C(2)H(5))(CH(3))(3)N), and N-ethyl-N-methylpyrrolidinium (empro) are not very different (-85.2, -82.8, -84.6, and -84.4 kcal/mol, respectively), while the size of the orientation dependence of the interaction energies follows the trend emim > epy approximately (C(2)H(5))(CH(3))(3)N > empro. Comparison with the experimental ionic conductivities shows that the magnitude and directionality of the interaction energy of the ion pairs play a crucial role in determining the ionic dissociation/association dynamics in the ionic liquids. The electrostatic interaction is the major source of attraction between ions. The induction contribution is small but not negligible. The hydrogen bonding with the C(2)-H of imidazolium is not essential for the attraction in the ion pair. The interaction energy of the BF(4)(-) complex with 1-ethyl-2,3-dimethylimidazolium (em2im) (-81.8 kcal/mol) is only 4% smaller than that of the emim complex.

摘要

采用MP2/6 - 311G水平的从头算方法研究了9种室温离子液体离子对的分子间相互作用能。1 - 乙基 - 3 - 甲基咪唑鎓(emim)配合物的相互作用能大小顺序为CF(3)CO(2)(-) > BF(4)(-) > CF(3)SO(3)(-) > (CF(3)SO(2))(2)N(-) ≈ PF(6)(-)(分别为 - 89.8、- 85.2、- 82.6、- 78.8和 - 78.4 kcal/mol)。BF(4)(-)与emim、乙基吡啶鎓(epy)、N - 乙基 - N,N,N - 三甲基铵((C(2)H(5))(CH(3))(3)N)和N - 乙基 - N - 甲基吡咯烷鎓(empro)形成配合物的相互作用能差异不大(分别为 - 85.2、- 82.8、- 84.6和 - 84.4 kcal/mol),而相互作用能的取向依赖性大小顺序为emim > epy ≈ (C(2)H(5))(CH(3))(3)N > empro。与实验离子电导率的比较表明,离子对相互作用能的大小和方向性在决定离子液体中的离子解离/缔合动力学方面起着关键作用。静电相互作用是离子间吸引力的主要来源。诱导贡献较小但不可忽略。与咪唑鎓的C(2)-H形成的氢键对于离子对中的吸引力并非至关重要。BF(4)(-)与1 - 乙基 - 2,3 - 二甲基咪唑鎓(em2im)形成配合物的相互作用能(- 81.8 kcal/mol)仅比emim配合物的相互作用能小4%。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验