Lefèvre M, Dodelet J P, Bertrand P
INRS-Energie, Matériaux et Télécommunications, 1650, Boulevard Lionel Boulet, Varennes, Canada, J3X 1S2.
J Phys Chem B. 2005 Sep 8;109(35):16718-24. doi: 10.1021/jp0529265.
A series of Co-based electrocatalysts for oxygen reduction in acid media has been prepared using two different Co precursors: cobalt acetate (CoAc) and a cobalt porphyrin (CoTMPP). These catalysts have been analyzed by ToF-SIMS to obtain information on the number and the structure of catalytic active sites in these materials. The results are compared with the results of a similar analysis already performed on a series of Fe-based electrocatalysts (J. Phys. Chem. B 2002, 106, 8705) also prepared with two different Fe precursors: iron acetate (FeAc) and an iron porphyrin (ClFeTMPP). The interpretation of ToF-SIMS data for Fe-based catalysts allowed us to conclude that whatever the Fe precursor was, the same catalytic sites (FeN2/C and FeN4/C, with their respective dominant ToF-SIMS signatures: FeN2C4+ and FeN4C8+ ions) were found. The comparison of the ToF-SIMS data with the activity of those catalysts led to the conclusion that the FeN2C catalytic site was more active than FeN4/C. When the same procedure is applied to ToF-SIMS data measured for Co-based catalysts, the following conclusions are drawn: (i) as for Fe precursors, both Co precursors also give similar results; (ii) as for Fe-based catalysts, the same four families of MetalNxCy+ ions, with 1, 2, 3, and 4 nitrogen atoms, are also found in the spectra of Co-based catalysts, but there is no dominant CoNxCy+ ion signature; (iii) only CoN4/C can be ascertained on the basis of ToF-SIMS measurements. There is no strong support from ToF-SIMS measurements for (or against) the existence of CoN2/C in Co-based catalysts as there is for FeN2/C in Fe-based catalysts; (iv) contrary to Fe-based catalysts, all catalytic sites (if there are any besides CoN4/C) are about equally active in Co-based electrocatalysts.
醋酸钴(CoAc)和钴卟啉(CoTMPP),制备了一系列用于酸性介质中氧还原的钴基电催化剂。通过飞行时间二次离子质谱(ToF-SIMS)对这些催化剂进行了分析,以获取有关这些材料中催化活性位点的数量和结构的信息。将结果与之前对一系列同样用两种不同铁前驱体制备的铁基电催化剂(《物理化学杂志B》2002年,第106卷,第8705页)进行的类似分析结果进行了比较,这两种铁前驱体分别是醋酸铁(FeAc)和铁卟啉(ClFeTMPP)。对铁基催化剂的ToF-SIMS数据的解读使我们得出结论,无论铁前驱体是什么,都发现了相同的催化位点(FeN2/C和FeN4/C,它们各自主要的ToF-SIMS特征峰为:FeN2C4+和FeN4C8+离子)。将ToF-SIMS数据与那些催化剂的活性进行比较后得出结论,FeN2C催化位点比FeN4/C更具活性。当对钴基催化剂测量的ToF-SIMS数据应用相同程序时,得出以下结论:(i)与铁前驱体一样,两种钴前驱体也给出了相似的结果;(ii)与铁基催化剂一样,在钴基催化剂的光谱中也发现了具有1、2、3和4个氮原子的相同的四类MetalNxCy+离子,但没有占主导地位的CoNxCy+离子特征峰;(iii)基于ToF-SIMS测量只能确定CoN4/C。ToF-SIMS测量没有像对铁基催化剂中的FeN2/C那样,有力地支持(或反对)钴基催化剂中存在CoN2/C;(iv)与铁基催化剂相反,在钴基电催化剂中,所有催化位点(如果除CoN4/C之外还有其他位点)的活性大致相同。