Vanden Bossche H
Anti-Infectives Research Departments, Janssen Reseach Foundation, B2340 Beerse, Belgium.
Rev Iberoam Micol. 1997 Jun;14(2):44-9.
The many drugs that are available at present to treat fungal infections can be divided into four broad groups on the basis of their mechanism of action. These antifungal agents either inhibit macromolecule synthesis (flucytosine), impair membrane barrier function (polyenes), inhibit ergosterol synthesis (allylamines, thiocarbamates, azole derivatives, morpholines), or interact with microtubules (griseofulvin). Drug resistance has been identified as the major cause of treatment failure among patients treated with flucytosine. A lesion in the UMP-pyrophosphorylase is the most frequent clinical determinant of resistance to 5FC in Candida albicans. Despite extensive use of polyene antibiotics for more than 30 years, emergence of acquired resistance seems not be a significant clinical problem. Polyene-resistant Candida isolates have a marked decrease in their ergosterol content. Acquired resistance to allylamines has not been reported from human pathogens, but, resistant phenotypes have been reported for variants of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and of Ustilago maydis. Tolerance to morpholines is seldom found. Intrinsic resistance to griseofulvin is due to the absence of a prolonged energy-dependent transport system for this antibiotic. Resistance to azole antifungal agents is known to be exceptional, although it does now appear to be increasing in importance in some groups of patients infected with e.g. Candida spp., Histoplasma capsulatum or Cryptococcus neoformans. For example, resistance to fluconazole is emerging in C. albicans, the major agent of oro-pharyngeal candidosis in AIDS patients, after long-term suppressive therapy. In the majority of cases, primary and secondary resistance to fluconazole and cross-resistance to other azole antifungal agents seems to originate from decreased intracellular accumulation of the azoles, which may result from reduced uptake or increased efflux of the molecules. In most C. albicans isolates the decreased intracellular levels can be correlated with enhanced azole efflux, a phenomenon linked to an increase in the amounts of mRNA of a C. albicans ABC transporter gene CDR1 and of a gene (BEN(r) or CaMDR) coding for a transporter belonging to the class of major facilitator multidrug efflux transporters. Not only fluconazole, ketoconazole and itraconazole are substrates for CDR1, terbinafine and amorolfine have also been established as substrates, BEN(r) overexpression only accounts for fluconazole resistance. Other sources of resistance: changes in membrane sterols and phospholipids, altered or overproduced target enzyme(s) and compensatory mutations in the Delta5,6-desaturase.
目前可用于治疗真菌感染的多种药物,根据其作用机制可分为四大类。这些抗真菌剂要么抑制大分子合成(氟胞嘧啶),损害膜屏障功能(多烯类),抑制麦角甾醇合成(烯丙胺类、硫代氨基甲酸盐类、唑类衍生物、吗啉类),要么与微管相互作用(灰黄霉素)。耐药性已被确定为接受氟胞嘧啶治疗的患者治疗失败的主要原因。尿苷一磷酸焦磷酸化酶的损伤是白色念珠菌对5-氟胞嘧啶耐药最常见的临床决定因素。尽管多烯类抗生素已广泛使用30多年,但获得性耐药的出现似乎并非一个重大的临床问题。对多烯类耐药的念珠菌分离株其麦角甾醇含量显著降低。人类病原体尚未报告对烯丙胺类的获得性耐药,但已报告酿酒酵母和玉米黑粉菌的变种存在耐药表型。对吗啉类的耐受性很少见。对灰黄霉素的固有耐药性是由于缺乏针对该抗生素的延长的能量依赖性转运系统。尽管目前在某些感染念珠菌属、荚膜组织胞浆菌或新型隐球菌的患者群体中,唑类抗真菌剂的耐药性似乎确实在增加,但已知对唑类抗真菌剂的耐药情况并不常见。例如,在艾滋病患者口腔念珠菌病的主要病原体白色念珠菌中,经过长期抑制治疗后,对氟康唑的耐药性正在出现。在大多数情况下,对氟康唑的原发和继发耐药以及对其他唑类抗真菌剂的交叉耐药似乎源于唑类在细胞内的积累减少,这可能是由于分子摄取减少或外排增加所致。在大多数白色念珠菌分离株中,细胞内水平降低与唑类外排增强相关,这一现象与白色念珠菌ABC转运蛋白基因CDR1的mRNA量增加以及一个编码属于主要易化子多药外排转运蛋白类别的转运蛋白的基因(BEN(r)或CaMDR)有关。不仅氟康唑、酮康唑和伊曲康唑是CDR1的底物,特比萘芬和阿莫罗芬也已被确定为底物,BEN(r)的过表达仅导致对氟康唑的耐药。其他耐药来源:膜甾醇和磷脂的变化、靶酶改变或过量产生以及Δ5,6-去饱和酶中的补偿性突变。