Sabelnikov Alex, Zhukov Vladimir, Kempf C Ruth
Center for Security Studies and Research, East Carolina University, Greenville, North Carolina, USA.
Int J Environ Health Res. 2006 Aug;16(4):241-53. doi: 10.1080/09603120600734105.
Emergency response strategies (guidelines) for biological, chemical, nuclear, or radiological terrorist events should be based on scientifically established exposure limits for all the agents or materials involved. In the case of a radiological terrorist event, emergency response guidelines (ERG) have been worked out. In the case of a terrorist event with the use of chemical warfare (CW) agents the situation is not that clear, though the new guidelines and clean-up values are being generated based on re-evaluation of toxicological and risk data. For biological warfare (BW) agents, such guidelines do not yet exist. In this paper the current status of airborne exposure limits (AELs) for chemical and biological warfare (CBW) agents are reviewed. Particular emphasis is put on BW agents that lack such data. An efficient, temporary solution to bridge the gap in experimental infectious data and to set provisional AELs for BW agents is suggested. It is based on mathematically generated risks of infection for BW agents grouped by their alleged ID50 values in three categories: with low, intermediate and high ID50 values.
针对生物、化学、核或放射性恐怖事件的应急响应策略(指南)应基于所有相关制剂或材料科学确定的接触限值。对于放射性恐怖事件,已经制定了应急响应指南(ERG)。对于使用化学战(CW)制剂的恐怖事件,情况尚不明朗,不过基于对毒理学和风险数据的重新评估,正在制定新的指南和清理值。对于生物战(BW)制剂,此类指南尚不存在。本文综述了化学和生物战(CBW)制剂的空气传播接触限值(AEL)的现状。特别强调了缺乏此类数据的生物战制剂。提出了一种有效的临时解决方案,以弥合实验性感染数据的差距,并为生物战制剂设定临时AEL。它基于根据其所谓的半数感染剂量(ID50)值分为三类的生物战制剂的数学感染风险:低ID50值、中等ID50值和高ID50值。