Suppr超能文献

每月进行自体动静脉内瘘血流量监测能否检测出明显狭窄——一项随机对照试验

Does monthly native arteriovenous fistula blood-flow surveillance detect significant stenosis--a randomized controlled trial.

作者信息

Polkinghorne Kevan R, Lau Kenneth K P, Saunder Alan, Atkins Robert C, Kerr Peter G

机构信息

Department of Nephrology, Monash Medical Centre, 246 Clayton Rd, Clayton, Melbourne, Victoria 3168, Australia.

出版信息

Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2006 Sep;21(9):2498-506. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfl242. Epub 2006 Jul 19.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Clinical practice guidelines recommend that the preferred method of surveillance for arteriovenous fistula (AVF) is the measurement of AVF blood flow (Qa). As these recommendations are based on observational studies, we conducted a randomized, prospective, double-blind, controlled trial to assess whether Qa surveillance results in an increased detection of AVF stenosis.

METHODS

A total of 137 patients were randomly assigned to receive either continuing AVF surveillance using current clinical criteria (control, usual treatment) or usual treatment plus AVF blood-flow surveillance by ultrasound dilution (Qa surveillance group). The primary outcome measure was the detection of a significant (>50%) AVF stenosis.

RESULTS

There were 67 and 68 patients assigned to the control and Qa surveillance groups, respectively. Patients in the Qa surveillance group were twice as likely to have a stenosis detected compared with the control hazard ratio (HR) confidence interval (CI) group (2.27, 95% 0.85-5.98, P = 0.09), with a trend for a significant stenosis to be detected earlier in the Qa surveillance group (P = 0.09, log rank test). However, using the Qa results alone prior to angiography, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve demonstrated, at best, a moderate prediction of (>50%) AVF stenosis (0.78, 95% CI 0.63-0.94, P = 0.006).

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates that the addition of AVF Qa monitoring to clinical screening for AVF stenosis resulted in a non-significant doubling in the detection of angiographically significant AVF stenosis. Further, large multi-centre randomized trials are feasible and will be necessary to confirm whether Qa surveillance and the correction of detected AVF stenosis will lead to a reduction in AVF thrombosis and increased AVF survival.

摘要

背景

临床实践指南推荐,动静脉内瘘(AVF)监测的首选方法是测量AVF血流量(Qa)。由于这些建议基于观察性研究,我们进行了一项随机、前瞻性、双盲、对照试验,以评估Qa监测是否能增加AVF狭窄的检出率。

方法

总共137例患者被随机分配,分别接受按照当前临床标准持续进行AVF监测(对照组,常规治疗)或常规治疗加超声稀释法进行AVF血流量监测(Qa监测组)。主要结局指标是检测出显著(>50%)的AVF狭窄。

结果

分别有67例和68例患者被分配至对照组和Qa监测组。与对照组相比,Qa监测组患者检测出狭窄的可能性是对照组的两倍(风险比[HR] 置信区间[CI] 为2.27,95% 0.85 - 5.98,P = 0.09),Qa监测组有更早检测出显著狭窄的趋势(P = 0.09,对数秩检验)。然而,在血管造影术前仅使用Qa结果,受试者工作特征曲线下面积充其量只能对(>50%)的AVF狭窄进行中度预测(0.78,95% CI 0.63 - 0.94,P = 0.006)。

结论

本研究表明,在AVF狭窄的临床筛查中增加AVF Qa监测,使血管造影显示的显著AVF狭窄检出率非显著性地提高了一倍。此外,大型多中心随机试验是可行的,有必要确认Qa监测以及对检测出的AVF狭窄进行纠正是否会降低AVF血栓形成并提高AVF生存率。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验