Carrère Nicolas, Sauvanet Alain, Goere Diane, Kianmanesh Reza, Vullierme Marie-Pierre, Couvelard Anne, Ruszniewski Philippe, Belghiti Jacques
Department of Digestive Surgery, Hôpital Beaujon, University Paris VII, 100 Bd du Général Leclerc, 92118, Clichy Cedex, France.
World J Surg. 2006 Aug;30(8):1526-35. doi: 10.1007/s00268-005-0784-4.
The value of mesentericoportal vein resection (VR) associated with pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) for pancreatic-head adenocarcinoma still remains controversial.
From 1989 to 2003, 45 consecutive patients with pancreatic-head adenocarcinoma underwent PD with mesentericoportal VR due to intraoperative macroscopic involvement of the superior mesenteric or portal vein (VR+ group). They were compared with 88 patients who underwent PD for adenocarcinoma without VR over the same time period (VR- group) and matched for age, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, pathological diagnosis, and nodal involvement. Preoperative features, intraoperative parameters, postoperative course, and survival were compared between the VR+ group and VR- group. Factors that may influence survival were determined by univariate and multivariate analyses.
Mortality, morbidity, and mean hospital stay did not differ between the two groups (VR+ 4.4%, 56%, and 22.6 days, respectively; VR- 5.7%, 64%, 24.6 days, respectively). In the group VR+, vein invasion was histologically proven in 29 (64%) patients. Three-year global survival and 3-year disease-free survival did not differ between the two groups: VR+ 22% and 14%, respectively; VR- 25% and 21%, respectively (log-rank: P=0.69 and P=0.39, respectively). Neither VR nor histologically proven vein involvement significantly impacted survival duration. On multivariate analysis, tumor-free margin was the most important prognostic factor.
Vein resection during PD can be performed safely. Patients with adenocarcinoma who require VR during PD have a survival not different from that of patients who undergo standard PD. Macroscopic isolated mesentericoportal vein involvement is not a contraindication for PD in patients with adenocarcinoma provided disease-free margins can be obtained.
胰十二指肠切除术(PD)联合肠系膜门静脉切除术(VR)治疗胰头腺癌的价值仍存在争议。
1989年至2003年,45例连续的胰头腺癌患者因术中肉眼可见肠系膜上静脉或门静脉受累而接受了PD联合肠系膜门静脉VR(VR+组)。将他们与同期88例未行VR的腺癌患者(VR-组)进行比较,两组在年龄、美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)评分、病理诊断和淋巴结受累情况方面相匹配。比较VR+组和VR-组的术前特征、术中参数、术后病程和生存率。通过单因素和多因素分析确定可能影响生存的因素。
两组的死亡率、发病率和平均住院天数无差异(VR+组分别为4.4%、56%和22.6天;VR-组分别为5.7%、64%、24.6天)。在VR+组中,29例(64%)患者经组织学证实有静脉侵犯。两组的3年总生存率和3年无病生存率无差异:VR+组分别为22%和14%;VR-组分别为25%和21%(对数秩检验:P分别为0.69和0.39)。VR和组织学证实的静脉侵犯均未对生存时间产生显著影响。多因素分析显示,切缘阴性是最重要的预后因素。
PD术中可安全地进行静脉切除。PD术中需要行VR的腺癌患者的生存率与接受标准PD的患者相同。只要能获得切缘阴性,肉眼可见的孤立肠系膜门静脉受累并非腺癌患者行PD的禁忌证。