Suppr超能文献

尿中戊糖苷不能预测有症状的膝关节骨关节炎患者的软骨丢失:BOKS研究。

Urinary pentosidine does not predict cartilage loss among subjects with symptomatic knee OA: the BOKS Study.

作者信息

Hunter D J, Lavalley M, Li J, Zhang Y, Bauer D, Nevitt M, Guermazi A, Degroot J, Sakkee N, Gale D, Felson D T

机构信息

Boston University Clinical Epidemiology Research and Training Unit, Boston, MA 02118, USA.

出版信息

Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2007 Jan;15(1):93-7. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2006.06.011. Epub 2006 Jul 20.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Age-related changes in articular cartilage are likely to play a role in the etiology of osteoarthritis (OA). One of the major changes in the extracellular matrix of cartilage is the age-related accumulation of advanced glycation end products (AGEs). Pentosidine, an AGE crosslink, is one of the few characterized AGEs and is considered an adequate marker for the many AGEs that are formed in vivo. We used data from a longitudinal observation study to determine if urinary pentosidine could serve as a marker to predict cartilage loss.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective analysis of data from the Boston Osteoarthritis of the Knee Study (BOKS); a completed natural history study of knee OA. All subjects in the study met American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria for knee OA. Knee magnetic resonance (MR) images were scored for cartilage in 14 plates of the knee using the Whole Organ Magnetic Resonance Imaging Score (WORMS) semiquantitative grading scheme. Within the BOKS population, a nested sample of 127 subjects (39% of the whole sample) who had both baseline pentosidine and longitudinal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) measurements (MRIs performed at baseline and 30 months later) was assessed. Urinary pentosidine was assayed and normalized to creatinine to account for differences in urine concentrations. We analyzed the data using three different methods to assess if baseline measures of pentosidine predicted subsequent cartilage loss on MRI. These were (1) analysis 1: logistic regression with the outcome cartilage loss in any plate; (2) analysis 2: proportional odds model where the outcome was defined as 0=no cartilage loss, 1=cartilage loss in one plate, 2=cartilage loss in two plates, and 3=cartilage loss in at least three plates; and (3) analysis 3: Poisson regression with the outcome the number of plates with cartilage loss. All analyses were adjusted for age, sex and Body Mass Index (BMI).

RESULTS

At baseline the mean (standard deviation) age was 67 (9) years and 54% were male. The results for the three analytic steps are as follows: Analysis 1: the odds ratio for cartilage loss is 1.01 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.93-1.09) with 1 unit increase in pentosidine. Analysis 2: the odds ratio for more cartilage loss is 0.99 (95% CI 0.92-1.06) with 1 unit increase in pentosidine. Analysis 3: the relative number of plates with cartilage loss decreased was 1.00 (95% CI 0.95-1.03) with a 1 unit increase in pentosidine.

CONCLUSION

Urinary pentosidine does not predict knee cartilage loss. Previous studies have suggested that local content within cartilage of AGEs is elevated in persons at high risk for progression. Our data suggest that these changes are not measurable systemically. Alternatively, urinary pentosidine levels reflect cartilage degradation in all joints (thus whole body cartilage breakdown) and may therefore not relate to OA severity in a single knee joint.

摘要

目的

关节软骨的年龄相关变化可能在骨关节炎(OA)的病因学中起作用。软骨细胞外基质的主要变化之一是与年龄相关的晚期糖基化终产物(AGEs)积累。戊糖苷是一种AGE交联物,是少数已被鉴定的AGEs之一,被认为是体内形成的众多AGEs的合适标志物。我们使用一项纵向观察研究的数据来确定尿戊糖苷是否可作为预测软骨丢失的标志物。

方法

我们对来自波士顿膝骨关节炎研究(BOKS)的数据进行了前瞻性分析;这是一项已完成的膝OA自然史研究。该研究中的所有受试者均符合美国风湿病学会(ACR)膝OA标准。使用全器官磁共振成像评分(WORMS)半定量分级方案对膝关节14个层面的软骨进行磁共振(MR)图像评分。在BOKS人群中,对127名受试者(占整个样本的39%)的嵌套样本进行了评估,这些受试者既有基线戊糖苷测量值,又有纵向磁共振成像(MRI)测量值(在基线和30个月后进行MRI检查)。检测尿戊糖苷并将其标准化为肌酐,以考虑尿液浓度差异。我们使用三种不同方法分析数据,以评估戊糖苷的基线测量值是否能预测后续MRI上的软骨丢失。这三种方法分别是:(1)分析1:以任何层面的软骨丢失为结局的逻辑回归;(2)分析2:比例优势模型,其中结局定义为0 =无软骨丢失,1 =一个层面软骨丢失,2 =两个层面软骨丢失,3 =至少三个层面软骨丢失;(3)分析3:以软骨丢失层面数为结局的泊松回归。所有分析均对年龄、性别和体重指数(BMI)进行了校正。

结果

基线时平均(标准差)年龄为67(9)岁,54%为男性。三个分析步骤的结果如下:分析1:戊糖苷每增加1个单位,软骨丢失的优势比为1.01(95%置信区间(CI)0.93 - 1.09)。分析2:戊糖苷每增加1个单位,更多软骨丢失的优势比为0.99(95% CI 0.92 - 1.06)。分析3:戊糖苷每增加1个单位,软骨丢失层面相对减少数为1.00(95% CI 0.95 - 1.03)。

结论

尿戊糖苷不能预测膝关节软骨丢失。先前的研究表明,进展风险高的人群软骨内AGEs的局部含量升高。我们的数据表明,这些变化无法通过全身测量得到。或者,尿戊糖苷水平反映了所有关节的软骨降解(从而反映全身软骨破坏),因此可能与单个膝关节的OA严重程度无关。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验