Klein Jonathan D, Sabaratnam Premini, Auerbach Melissa Matos, Smith Shannon M, Kodjo Cheryl, Lewis Kathy, Ryan Sheryl, Dandino Chris
Division of Adolescent Medicine, Leadership Education in Adolescent Health Training Program, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York, USA.
J Adolesc Health. 2006 Aug;39(2):252-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2005.12.004.
Positive youth development is increasingly recognized as important to the health and well-being of adolescents. We describe the development of a brief, standardized instrument for measuring outcomes and indicators important for youth development evaluation. Additionally, we describe the psychometric properties of these constructs.
A coalition of representatives from 12 community organizations, funders, and researchers identified four core outcomes associated with positive youth development likely able to be affected by community-based youth-serving agencies. Items were piloted and field tested to test feasibility and establish face validity with experts and with adolescents. Furthermore, we tested construct reliability using factor analysis to determine how well the items reflected underlying constructs.
Items representing four empirical constructs were used to survey 389 adolescents. Those who participated in the pilot took an average of 11 minutes to complete the survey. Overall, 24 items loaded on to six discrete factors representing the outcomes of basic social skills, caring adult relationships, and decision-making. When participants under age 13 years were eliminated from the analysis, items were more cohesive, resulting in a five-factor solution with all items loading at .40 or higher.
The four youth development outcomes identified by community-based youth-serving organizations factor into reliable constructs with acceptable alpha coefficients for adolescents over age 13. A major strength of this youth development outcome measurement is that it has an easy-to-administer format, which allows community-based programs to receive feedback for program improvement, and to track the effectiveness of their programs for funders.
积极的青少年发展日益被认为对青少年的健康和幸福至关重要。我们描述了一种简短、标准化的工具的开发,该工具用于测量对青少年发展评估很重要的结果和指标。此外,我们还描述了这些构念的心理测量特性。
一个由12个社区组织、资助者和研究人员的代表组成的联盟确定了与积极的青少年发展相关的四个核心结果,这些结果可能会受到社区青少年服务机构的影响。对项目进行了试点和实地测试,以检验可行性,并与专家和青少年建立表面效度。此外,我们使用因子分析来测试结构可靠性,以确定这些项目在多大程度上反映了潜在的构念。
代表四个实证构念的项目被用于对389名青少年进行调查。参与试点的人平均花费11分钟完成调查。总体而言,24个项目加载到六个离散因子上,这些因子代表了基本社交技能、关爱成年人关系和决策等结果。当将13岁以下的参与者从分析中排除时,项目的凝聚力更强,从而产生了一个五因子解决方案,所有项目的载荷均为0.40或更高。
社区青少年服务组织确定的四个青少年发展结果形成了可靠的构念,对于13岁以上的青少年具有可接受的阿尔法系数。这种青少年发展结果测量的一个主要优点是它具有易于实施的形式,这使得社区项目能够获得项目改进的反馈,并为资助者跟踪其项目的有效性。