• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

健康教育影响问卷(heiQ):一种针对慢性病患者的患者教育和自我管理干预措施的结果与评估指标。

The Health Education Impact Questionnaire (heiQ): an outcomes and evaluation measure for patient education and self-management interventions for people with chronic conditions.

作者信息

Osborne Richard H, Elsworth Gerald R, Whitfield Kathryn

机构信息

Centre for Rheumatic Diseases, Department of Medicine, The University of Melbourne, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Melbourne, Victoria 3050, Australia.

出版信息

Patient Educ Couns. 2007 May;66(2):192-201. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2006.12.002. Epub 2007 Feb 22.

DOI:10.1016/j.pec.2006.12.002
PMID:17320338
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This paper describes the development and validation of the Health Education Impact Questionnaire (heiQ). The aim was to develop a user-friendly, relevant, and psychometrically sound instrument for the comprehensive evaluation of patient education programs, which can be applied across a broad range of chronic conditions.

METHODS

Item development for the heiQ was guided by a Program Logic Model, Concept Mapping, interviews with stakeholders and psychometric analyses. Construction (N=591) and confirmatory (N=598) samples were drawn from consumers of patient education programs and hospital outpatients. The properties of the heiQ were investigated using item response theory and structural equation modeling.

RESULTS

Over 90 candidate items were generated, with 42 items selected for inclusion in the final scale. Eight independent dimensions were derived: Positive and Active Engagement in Life (five items, Cronbach's alpha (alpha)=0.86); Health Directed Behavior (four items, alpha=0.80); Skill and Technique Acquisition (five items, alpha=0.81); Constructive Attitudes and Approaches (five items, alpha=0.81); Self-Monitoring and Insight (seven items, alpha=0.70); Health Service Navigation (five items, alpha=0.82); Social Integration and Support (five items, alpha=0.86); and Emotional Wellbeing (six items, alpha=0.89).

CONCLUSION

The heiQ has high construct validity and is a reliable measure of a broad range of patient education program benefits.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

The heiQ will provide valuable information to clinicians, researchers, policymakers and other stakeholders about the value of patient education programs in chronic disease management.

摘要

目的

本文描述了健康教育影响问卷(heiQ)的开发与验证过程。目的是开发一种用户友好、相关且心理测量学上合理的工具,用于全面评估患者教育项目,该工具可应用于广泛的慢性疾病。

方法

heiQ的项目开发以项目逻辑模型、概念映射、与利益相关者的访谈以及心理测量分析为指导。构建样本(N = 591)和验证样本(N = 598)来自患者教育项目的消费者和医院门诊患者。使用项目反应理论和结构方程模型研究了heiQ的特性。

结果

生成了90多个候选项目,最终量表中纳入了42个项目。得出了八个独立维度:积极参与生活(五个项目,克朗巴哈系数(α)= 0.86);健康导向行为(四个项目,α = 0.80);技能和技术获取(五个项目,α = 0.81);建设性态度和方法(五个项目,α = 0.81);自我监测与洞察(七个项目,α = 0.70);健康服务导航(五个项目,α = 0.82);社会融合与支持(五个项目,α = 0.86);以及情绪健康(六个项目,α = 0.89)。

结论

heiQ具有较高的结构效度,是衡量一系列患者教育项目益处的可靠指标。

实践意义

heiQ将为临床医生、研究人员、政策制定者和其他利益相关者提供有关患者教育项目在慢性病管理中的价值的宝贵信息。

相似文献

1
The Health Education Impact Questionnaire (heiQ): an outcomes and evaluation measure for patient education and self-management interventions for people with chronic conditions.健康教育影响问卷(heiQ):一种针对慢性病患者的患者教育和自我管理干预措施的结果与评估指标。
Patient Educ Couns. 2007 May;66(2):192-201. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2006.12.002. Epub 2007 Feb 22.
2
The extent and breadth of benefits from participating in chronic disease self-management courses: a national patient-reported outcomes survey.参与慢性病自我管理课程的益处的范围和广度:一项全国患者报告结局调查
Patient Educ Couns. 2007 Mar;65(3):351-60. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2006.08.016. Epub 2006 Oct 5.
3
Patient perspective on quality of geriatric care and rehabilitation--development and psychometric testing of a questionnaire.患者对老年护理与康复质量的看法——一份问卷的编制与心理测量学测试
Scand J Caring Sci. 2006 Jun;20(2):135-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6712.2006.00390.x.
4
[Self management in chronically ill adolescents: development of a short questionnaire].[慢性病青少年的自我管理:一份简短问卷的编制]
Rehabilitation (Stuttg). 2009 Aug;48(4):228-37. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1234050. Epub 2009 Aug 17.
5
Diabetes Education and Self-Management for Ongoing and Newly Diagnosed (DESMOND): process modelling of pilot study.糖尿病持续及新诊断患者的教育与自我管理(DESMOND):试点研究的过程建模
Patient Educ Couns. 2006 Dec;64(1-3):369-77. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2006.04.007. Epub 2006 Sep 29.
6
A randomised control trial of a self-management program for people with a chronic illness from Vietnamese, Chinese, Italian and Greek backgrounds.一项针对越南、中国、意大利和希腊裔慢性病患者自我管理项目的随机对照试验。
Patient Educ Couns. 2006 Dec;64(1-3):360-8. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2006.04.003. Epub 2006 Jul 21.
7
Tests of measurement invariance failed to support the application of the "then-test".测量不变性检验未能支持“then-test”的应用。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2009 Nov;62(11):1173-80. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.01.021. Epub 2009 Jul 12.
8
Change of perspective: a measurable and desired outcome of chronic disease self-management intervention programs that violates the premise of preintervention/postintervention assessment.视角转变:慢性病自我管理干预项目可测量且期望达成的结果,这一结果违背了干预前/干预后评估的前提。
Arthritis Rheum. 2006 Jun 15;55(3):458-65. doi: 10.1002/art.21982.
9
Item response theory analyses of physical functioning items in the medical outcomes study.医学结果研究中身体功能项目的项目反应理论分析。
Med Care. 2007 May;45(5 Suppl 1):S32-8. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000246649.43232.82.
10
The evaluation of chronic disease self-management support across settings: the international experience of the health education impact questionnaire quality monitoring system.评估跨环境下的慢性病自我管理支持:健康教育培训影响问卷质量监测系统的国际经验。
Nurs Clin North Am. 2011 Sep;46(3):255-70, v. doi: 10.1016/j.cnur.2011.05.010.

引用本文的文献

1
Self-Management Interventions for Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Systematic Review.肾移植受者的自我管理干预措施:一项系统综述
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Aug 5;13(15):1918. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13151918.
2
Health coaching for people with long-term conditions and multimorbidity: a mixed methods prospective service evaluation of Structured Agenda-free Coaching Conversations (StACC) in UK primary care.针对患有长期疾病和多种疾病的人群的健康指导:英国初级医疗中结构化无议程指导对话(StACC)的混合方法前瞻性服务评估
BMC Public Health. 2025 Jul 3;25(1):2365. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-23535-0.
3
Analysis of a women's health information website established by the Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare.
日本厚生劳动省设立的女性健康信息网站分析。
Womens Health (Lond). 2025 Jan-Dec;21:17455057251347088. doi: 10.1177/17455057251347088. Epub 2025 Jun 29.
4
Structural validity and test-retest reliability of the Patient Reported Inventory of Self-Management of Chronic Conditions (PRISM-CC) in a Swedish population of seventy-year-olds with long-term health conditions.慢性病自我管理患者报告量表(PRISM-CC)在瑞典患有长期健康问题的70岁人群中的结构效度和重测信度。
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2025 May 28;9(1):59. doi: 10.1186/s41687-025-00892-3.
5
At-home Breast Oncology care Delivered with EHealth solutions (ABODE) study protocol: a randomised controlled trial.采用电子健康解决方案提供的居家乳腺肿瘤护理(ABODE)研究方案:一项随机对照试验。
BMJ Open. 2025 May 8;15(5):e091579. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-091579.
6
The broad range of self-management strategies that people with rheumatic and musculoskeletal conditions apply: an online survey using a citizen science approach.风湿性和肌肉骨骼疾病患者采用的广泛自我管理策略:一项采用公民科学方法的在线调查
Rheumatol Int. 2025 May 6;45(5):135. doi: 10.1007/s00296-025-05842-2.
7
Changes in Health Education Literacy After Structured Web-Based Education Versus Self-Directed Online Information Seeking in Patients Undergoing Carpal Tunnel Release Surgery: Nonrandomized, Controlled Study.接受腕管松解手术患者中,基于网络的结构化教育与自主在线信息搜索后健康教育素养的变化:非随机对照研究。
JMIR Form Res. 2025 Mar 25;9:e65114. doi: 10.2196/65114.
8
Preventing "tipping points" in high comorbidity patients: A lifeline from health coaches - rationale, design and methods.预防高共病患者的“临界点”:健康教练的生命线——基本原理、设计与方法
Contemp Clin Trials. 2025 May;152:107865. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2025.107865. Epub 2025 Feb 28.
9
Comparison of the Efficacy of Type 2 Diabetes Group Training Courses With and Without the Integration of mHealth Support in a Controlled Trial Setting: Results of a Comparative Pilot Study.在对照试验环境下,2型糖尿病群体培训课程整合与未整合移动健康支持的疗效比较:一项比较性试点研究的结果
Diabetes Spectr. 2024 Sep 16;38(1):58-67. doi: 10.2337/ds24-0012. eCollection 2025 Winter.
10
Assessment of Technology Readiness in Norwegian Older Adults With Long-Term Health Conditions Receiving Home Care Services: Cross-Sectional Questionnaire Study.对接受家庭护理服务的患有长期健康状况的挪威老年人的技术准备情况评估:横断面问卷调查研究。
JMIR Aging. 2025 Feb 7;8:e62936. doi: 10.2196/62936.