Deryke C Andrew, Du Xiaoli, Nicolau David P
Center for Anti-Infective Research and Development, Hartford Hospital, Hartford, CT 06102, USA.
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2006 Sep;58(3):601-9. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkl292. Epub 2006 Jul 19.
The increasingly recognized prevalence of first-step parC mutants in Streptococcus pneumoniae and the development of de novo resistance while on fluoroquinolone therapy are of concern. Previous work by our group demonstrated the ability of moxifloxacin, but not levofloxacin, to eradicate parC mutants. The objective of this experiment was to determine whether these fluoroquinolone antibiotics provided equivalent bacterial kill when similar AUC/MICs were examined.
An in vitro pharmacodynamic model was used to simulate the epithelial lining fluid (ELF) concentrations following oral administration of levofloxacin 500 mg once daily and moxifloxacin 400 mg once daily in older adults. In addition, a range of AUC/MICs were also modelled, including levofloxacin 750 mg once daily. Five different S. pneumoniae containing first-step parC mutations and one isolate without mutations were tested for 48 h and time-kill curves were constructed. Samples at 0, 24 and 48 h were collected for phenotypic and genotypic profiling. HPLC was used to verify that target exposures were achieved.
The isolate without a parC mutation displayed a 4 log reduction in cfu after treatment with levofloxacin 500 mg and did not select for resistance. In all five isolates containing first-step parC mutations, resistance emerged within 48 h with a > or =16-fold increase in MIC and the acquisition of a gyrA mutant. Increasing the exposure of levofloxacin to approximately 750 mg dose still led to > or =16-fold increase in MIC at 48 h in two of the four isolates containing parC mutations. On the other hand, moxifloxacin 400 mg sustained bacterial killing against the two isolates tested without the selection of resistant mutants. It appears that the critical AUC/MIC necessary to prevent the acquisition of resistance for levofloxacin is 200 and approximately 400 for moxifloxacin.
Due to suboptimal exposures, once-daily oral regimens of levofloxacin at both 500 and 750 mg inconsistently led to bactericidal activity and the frequent acquisition of a second-step gyrA mutation in S. pneumoniae isolates already containing a first-step parC mutation. Conversely, once-daily moxifloxacin 400 mg provides exposures that vastly exceed the apparent efficacy breakpoint and did not select for second-step mutants until exposures were decreased 4-fold. As a result of these data and the emerging literature involving mutations in the pneumococcus, caution should be exercised when the respiratory fluoroquinolones are used to treat patients infected with S. pneumoniae suspected of having parC mutations.
肺炎链球菌中第一步parC突变体的流行率日益受到关注,且在氟喹诺酮治疗期间会出现新的耐药性。我们小组之前的研究表明莫西沙星能够根除parC突变体,而左氧氟沙星则不能。本实验的目的是确定当检测相似的AUC/MIC时,这些氟喹诺酮类抗生素是否具有同等的杀菌效果。
采用体外药效学模型模拟老年人每日口服一次500mg左氧氟沙星和每日口服一次400mg莫西沙星后的上皮衬液(ELF)浓度。此外,还模拟了一系列的AUC/MIC,包括每日一次750mg左氧氟沙星。对五种含有第一步parC突变的不同肺炎链球菌菌株和一种无突变的菌株进行了48小时的测试,并绘制了时间-杀菌曲线。在0、24和48小时采集样本进行表型和基因型分析。采用高效液相色谱法验证是否达到了目标暴露水平。
未发生parC突变的菌株在用500mg左氧氟沙星治疗后cfu减少了4个对数,且未产生耐药性。在所有五种含有第一步parC突变的菌株中,48小时内出现了耐药性,MIC增加了≥16倍,并获得了gyrA突变体。将左氧氟沙星的暴露量增加到约750mg剂量,在四种含有parC突变的菌株中,仍有两种在48小时时MIC增加了≥16倍。另一方面,400mg莫西沙星对测试的两种菌株持续杀菌,且未选择耐药突变体。似乎左氧氟沙星预防耐药性所需的临界AUC/MIC为200,而莫西沙星约为400。
由于暴露水平不理想,每日一次口服500mg和750mg左氧氟沙星的方案在含有第一步parC突变的肺炎链球菌菌株中,杀菌活性不一致,且频繁获得第二步gyrA突变。相反,每日一次口服400mg莫西沙星提供的暴露量大大超过了明显的疗效断点,在暴露量降低4倍之前不会选择第二步突变体。根据这些数据以及涉及肺炎球菌突变的新文献,在使用呼吸氟喹诺酮类药物治疗疑似感染有parC突变的肺炎链球菌患者时应谨慎。