Schafer Jeremy, Hovde Laurie B, Simonson Dana, Rotschafer John C
Antibiotic Pharmacodynamic Research Institute, Department of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology, College of Pharmacy, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2008 Feb;60(2):155-61. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2007.08.005. Epub 2007 Oct 29.
Levofloxacin binds topoisomerase IV, whereas moxifloxacin preferentially binds DNA gyrase. Most 1st-step pneumococcal mutants have alterations in the parC gene of topoisomerase IV. Because of differential binding affinity, moxifloxacin may have superior activity against 1st-step mutants compared with levofloxacin. The purpose of this work was to compare rates and extent of bacterial killing of genetically characterized Streptococcus pneumoniae with moxifloxacin and levofloxacin. Four strains of S. pneumoniae were used: a wild type, 2 first-step parC mutants, and a pump mutant. Using an in vitro pharmacodynamic model run in duplicate, we exposed bacteria to unbound moxifloxacin and levofloxacin peaks of 2 and 4.5 mg/L, respectively, which emulated clinical dosing. Additional experiments were done in which the area under the curve (AUC)/MIC ratio of 1 agent was matched to the competing drug's clinical dose AUC/MIC ratio. Time kill curves were analyzed for rate and extent of bacterial kill and regrowth. Pre- and postexposure MIC and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing were done. Moxifloxacin and levofloxacin displayed similar rates and extent of bacterial kill for the wild type, efflux pump type, and parC mutant 27-1361B. Moxifloxacin initially achieved a faster rate of kill, regardless of the AUC/MIC ratio, against parC mutant 7362 (P < 0.05) but not an advantage in time to 3 log kill. Postexposure MIC values were elevated for strain 7362 in 2 moxifloxacin experiments and 1 levofloxacin experiment. Post-PCR analysis revealed new gyrA mutations for all 3 isolates. Both moxifloxacin and levofloxacin are effective against multiple strains of S. pneumoniae.
左氧氟沙星与拓扑异构酶IV结合,而莫西沙星则优先与DNA旋转酶结合。大多数第一步肺炎球菌突变体的拓扑异构酶IV的parC基因发生改变。由于结合亲和力不同,与左氧氟沙星相比,莫西沙星对第一步突变体可能具有更强的活性。这项研究的目的是比较莫西沙星和左氧氟沙星对基因特征明确的肺炎链球菌的杀菌速率和程度。使用了四株肺炎链球菌:一株野生型、两株第一步parC突变体和一株泵突变体。使用重复进行的体外药效学模型,我们将细菌分别暴露于未结合的莫西沙星和左氧氟沙星峰值浓度2 mg/L和4.5 mg/L,这模拟了临床给药。还进行了其他实验,使一种药物的曲线下面积(AUC)/最低抑菌浓度(MIC)比值与竞争药物的临床剂量AUC/MIC比值相匹配。分析时间杀菌曲线以确定细菌杀灭和再生长的速率和程度。进行了暴露前和暴露后的MIC以及聚合酶链反应(PCR)检测。对于野生型、外排泵型和parC突变体27 - 1361B,莫西沙星和左氧氟沙星表现出相似的细菌杀灭速率和程度。无论AUC/MIC比值如何,莫西沙星对parC突变体7362最初的杀灭速率更快(P < 0.05),但在达到3 log杀灭时间方面没有优势。在2次莫西沙星实验和1次左氧氟沙星实验中,菌株7362暴露后的MIC值升高。PCR后分析显示所有3株分离株都有新的gyrA突变。莫西沙星和左氧氟沙星对多株肺炎链球菌均有效。