Mattler Uwe, Wüstenberg Torsten, Heinze Hans-Jochen
Neurological Clinic II, Otto-von-Guericke-University, Center for Advanced Imaging, Magdeburg, Germany.
Brain Res. 2006 Sep 13;1109(1):128-41. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2006.06.051. Epub 2006 Jul 21.
A central question regarding the nature of cognitive control is the extent to which different tasks are controlled by a common system. We addressed this issue by comparing the cortical activation associated with the processing of an invalidly cued event with the activation associated with a validly cued event. In a perceptual cueing task, we cued the likely stimulus modality (visual or auditory), and in a motor cueing task, we cued the likely motor response (left or right hand). Event-related functional MRI revealed increased activation in the anterior cingulate cortex on valid and invalid trials in both tasks. In addition, a network of six regions, including the dorsal medial frontal cortex, showed increased activation on invalid trials irrespective of whether the invalid cue referred to the stimulus modality or response. Findings suggest that dorsal medial frontal cortex rather than the anterior cingulated cortex is involved in conflict monitoring operations. We summarize our findings in a model that links six modules for processing invalidly cued events.
关于认知控制本质的一个核心问题是不同任务受共同系统控制的程度。我们通过比较与无效线索提示事件处理相关的皮层激活和与有效线索提示事件相关的激活来解决这个问题。在一个知觉线索提示任务中,我们提示可能的刺激模态(视觉或听觉),而在一个运动线索提示任务中,我们提示可能的运动反应(左手或右手)。事件相关功能磁共振成像显示,在两个任务的有效和无效试验中,前扣带回皮层的激活均增加。此外,包括背内侧前额叶皮层在内的六个区域组成的网络,在无效试验中显示出激活增加,而不管无效线索是指刺激模态还是反应。研究结果表明,参与冲突监测操作的是背内侧前额叶皮层而非前扣带回皮层。我们在一个将六个处理无效线索提示事件的模块联系起来的模型中总结了我们的研究结果。