Ford Kristen A, Goltz Herbert C, Brown Matthew R G, Everling Stefan
Department of Psychology, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada.
J Neurophysiol. 2005 Jul;94(1):429-40. doi: 10.1152/jn.00471.2004. Epub 2005 Feb 23.
One of the hallmarks of cognitive control is the suppression of prepotent but inappropriate responses. Here we used event-related functional MRI to measure functional brain activation during a stimulus-response incompatibility task. Subjects were instructed before a stimulus appeared either to look at the stimulus (prosaccade) or to look away from the stimulus (antisaccade). Eye movements were recorded so that functional brain activation could be grouped into prosaccades, correct antisaccades, and errors (saccades toward the stimulus on antisaccade trials). Correct antisaccade trials were associated with significantly more activation in frontal and parietal cortical areas compared with prosaccade trials during the late preparatory period before stimulus appearance. Correct antisaccades evoked more activation than errors in the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), and presupplementary eye fields during this period. No significant differences were found for any comparisons early in the preparatory period. Our data suggest that the preparation of an antisaccade activates a large frontal and parietal network that may be involved in presetting the oculomotor system for the antisaccade task. These findings indicate that a large network of frontal and posterior areas is modulated during the latter component of the preparatory period on antisaccade compared with prosaccade trials. The results further suggest that the activation level of frontal cortical areas before stimulus presentation is associated with subjects' performance in the antisaccade task. In contrast, we found no areas that were more active for correct antisaccades than prosaccades or for correct antisaccades than error antisaccades during the stimulus-response period. In fact, a number of posterior cortical areas and a few areas in the superior frontal lobe were more active during the stimulus-response period on prosaccade trials than on antisaccade trials. Error antisaccades showed a larger activation in the ACC during the stimulus-response period compared with correct antisaccades.
认知控制的一个标志是抑制优势但不适当的反应。在此,我们使用事件相关功能磁共振成像来测量刺激 - 反应不兼容任务期间大脑的功能激活。在刺激出现之前,指示受试者要么看向刺激物(顺向眼跳),要么看向远离刺激物的方向(反向眼跳)。记录眼动情况,以便将大脑功能激活分为顺向眼跳、正确的反向眼跳和错误情况(在反向眼跳试验中看向刺激物的眼跳)。与刺激出现前的晚期准备阶段的顺向眼跳试验相比,正确的反向眼跳试验在额叶和顶叶皮质区域的激活明显更多。在此期间,正确的反向眼跳在右侧背外侧前额叶皮质、前扣带回皮质(ACC)和补充眼动区诱发的激活比错误情况更多。在准备期早期的任何比较中均未发现显著差异。我们的数据表明,反向眼跳的准备激活了一个大的额叶和顶叶网络,该网络可能参与为反向眼跳任务预设动眼系统。这些发现表明,与顺向眼跳试验相比,在反向眼跳准备期的后期,一个由额叶和后部区域组成的大网络受到调制。结果进一步表明,刺激呈现前额叶皮质区域的激活水平与受试者在反向眼跳任务中的表现相关。相比之下,我们发现在刺激 - 反应期,没有任何区域对于正确的反向眼跳比顺向眼跳更活跃,或者对于正确的反向眼跳比错误的反向眼跳更活跃。事实上,在顺向眼跳试验的刺激 - 反应期,一些后部皮质区域和额上叶的一些区域比反向眼跳试验更活跃。与正确的反向眼跳相比,错误的反向眼跳在刺激 - 反应期的ACC中显示出更大的激活。