Suppr超能文献

血管性血友病因子实验室分析的外部质量评估计划:来自欧洲血栓形成与残疾基金会协调行动的概述

An external quality assessment program for von Willebrand factor laboratory analysis: an overview from the European concerted action on thrombosis and disabilities foundation.

作者信息

Meijer Piet, Haverkate Frits

机构信息

European Concerted Action on Thrombosis and Disabilities (ECAT) Foundation, Leiden, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Semin Thromb Hemost. 2006 Jul;32(5):485-91. doi: 10.1055/s-2006-947862.

Abstract

The laboratory diagnosis of von Willebrand disease (vWD) is complex and requires a panel of different laboratory tests. Because of this complexity, a proper quality control process is necessary. Since 2003, the European Concerted Action on Thrombosis and Disabilities Foundation has provided an external quality control program for several laboratory tests included in the diagnosis of vWD. Currently, ~180 different laboratories participate in this program, of which the vast majority perform both von Willebrand factor (vWF):antigen (Ag) and activity tests. The lowest between-laboratory variation was observed for the vWF antigen assay (10 to 24%), with a better performance for the latex immunoassay (8 to 24%) than the enzyme immunoassay (13 to 25%). Both the ristocetin cofactor activity assay (RCo) and the collagen-binding assay showed a higher between-laboratory variation (20 to 40% and 17 to 29%, respectively). We have observed that the within-laboratory repeatability for normal samples ranged from 0 to 40% for the antigen assay and from 0 to 86% for the ristocetin cofactor activity assay. Normal samples were interpreted correctly by the majority of the participants. However, type 1 vWD samples were wrongly interpreted by 20 to 40% of the participants, which was mainly caused by a discordance in the vWF:RCo/vWF:Ag ratio. It can be concluded that further improvement in the laboratory diagnosis of vWD is necessary.

摘要

血管性血友病(vWD)的实验室诊断较为复杂,需要一系列不同的实验室检测。鉴于这种复杂性,适当的质量控制流程必不可少。自2003年以来,欧洲血栓形成与残疾协同行动基金会为vWD诊断中包含的多项实验室检测提供了外部质量控制计划。目前,约180家不同的实验室参与了该计划,其中绝大多数实验室同时进行血管性血友病因子(vWF):抗原(Ag)检测和活性检测。vWF抗原检测的实验室间变异最低(10%至24%),乳胶免疫测定法(8%至24%)的表现优于酶免疫测定法(13%至25%)。瑞斯托霉素辅因子活性检测(RCo)和胶原结合检测的实验室间变异均较高(分别为20%至40%和17%至29%)。我们观察到,正常样本的实验室内部重复性在抗原检测中为0%至40%,在瑞斯托霉素辅因子活性检测中为0%至86%。大多数参与者能够正确解读正常样本。然而,20%至40%的参与者对1型vWD样本解读错误,这主要是由于vWF:RCo/vWF:Ag比值不一致所致。可以得出结论,vWD的实验室诊断仍需进一步改进。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验