Vangenechten Inge, Gadisseur Alain
Haemostasis Unit Department of Haematology Antwerp University Hospital Edegem Belgium.
CSL Behring Chair in von Willebrand Disease Antwerp University Antwerp Belgium.
Res Pract Thromb Haemost. 2020 Jul 16;4(6):1024-1034. doi: 10.1002/rth2.12408. eCollection 2020 Aug.
Phenotypic von Willebrand disease (VWD) classification requires multiple tests including analysis of multimeric distributions von Willebrand factor (VWF) and evaluation of its structure. VWF multimer analysis is labor intensive, nonstandardized, and limited to specialized laboratories. A commercial semiautomatic assay, HYDRAGEL VW multimer assay (H5/11VWM, Sebia), has become available.
Establishment of reference ranges for H5/11VWM to improve VWD classification.
Implementation validation, establishment and validation of normal and pathological reference intervals (NRIs/PRIs), comparison with in-house method using 40 healthy volunteers and 231 VWD patients.
Qualitative and quantitative validation of NRI obtained sensitivity of 88% and 79%, respectively, for type 2. Comparison of the two methods showed an overall concordance of 86% with major conflicting results in all atypical 2B (n = 7) and 50% 2M-GPIb (n = 41) showing quantitative and qualitative multimeric loss, that was not detected with in-house method. We were able to use established PRIs, with 73% validity in type 2 cases, to distinguish individual type 2A subtypes (IIA, IIC, IID, IIE) from 2M and 2B.
H5/11VWM could be used for all clinical purposes because its reliability and its rapid and accurate diagnostic ability and reduced observer bias. Although H5/11VWM cannot evaluate triplet structures, we were able to define 2A subtypes by stripping back to the percentage of intermediate/high-molecular-weight multimers. H5/11HWM could be an efficient and widely available alternative for the "gold standard" technique.
血管性血友病(VWD)的表型分类需要多项检测,包括分析血管性血友病因子(VWF)的多聚体分布及其结构评估。VWF多聚体分析劳动强度大、缺乏标准化且仅限于专业实验室。一种商业化的半自动检测方法,即HYDRAGEL VW多聚体检测法(H5/11VWM,Sebia公司)已可供使用。
建立H5/11VWM的参考范围以改善VWD分类。
进行实施验证、建立和验证正常及病理参考区间(NRI/PRI),并使用40名健康志愿者和231例VWD患者与内部方法进行比较。
NRI的定性和定量验证对2型的敏感性分别为88%和79%。两种方法的比较显示总体一致性为86%,在所有非典型2B型(n = 7)和50%的2M-GPIb型(n = 41)中存在主要冲突结果,显示出定量和定性的多聚体缺失,而内部方法未检测到。我们能够使用已建立的PRI,在2型病例中的有效性为73%,以区分2A亚型(IIA、IIC、IID、IIE)与2M型和2B型。
H5/11VWM因其可靠性、快速准确的诊断能力以及减少的观察者偏倚,可用于所有临床目的。尽管H5/11VWM无法评估三联体结构,但我们能够通过还原为中/高分子量多聚体的百分比来定义2A亚型。H5/11HWM可能是“金标准”技术的一种有效且广泛可用的替代方法。