Missiaen Pieter, Smith Thierry, Guo Dian-Yong, Bloch Jonathan I, Gingerich Philip D
Research Unit Paleontology, Ghent University, Krijgslaan 281-S8, 9000, Ghent, Belgium.
Naturwissenschaften. 2006 Aug;93(8):407-11. doi: 10.1007/s00114-006-0122-1. Epub 2006 May 23.
Arctostylopids are common in Late Palaeocene and Early Eocene mammal faunas of Asia, but they are rare in North America. From the time of their first discovery, arctostylopids were grouped with the strictly endemic South American Notoungulata based on their strikingly similar dental morphology. This relationship was challenged based on dental morphology of more recently discovered arctostylopids and on supposed tarsal morphology (based on unassociated material) of the Asian arctostylopid Palaeostylops. Therefore, Arctostylopidae were placed in a separate order, Arctostylopida, of enigmatic affinities. Many authors, however, continue to unite Arctostylopidae and Notoungulata based on dental similarities. In the Late Palaeocene Subeng site in Inner Mongolia, we identified the Palaeostylops tarsals based on their size and abundance. This identification is supported by comparison to unpublished Arctostylops tarsals from the North American Clarkforkian, derived from a semi-articulated skeleton also including dental material. Tarsal morphology shows moderate similarity to the gliriform Pseudictops, and strong resemblance to the tarsally conservative gliroid Rhombomylus. Hence, Arctostylopidae may best be grouped with Asian non-gliroid Gliriformes, which we interpret as having dispersed into North America in the Late Palaeocene.
袋犀兽类在亚洲晚古新世和早始新世的哺乳动物群中很常见,但在北美却很罕见。从首次被发现起,袋犀兽类就因其极为相似的牙齿形态,与南美洲特有的南方有蹄目归为一类。然而,基于最近发现的袋犀兽类的牙齿形态以及亚洲袋犀兽类古袋犀兽(基于零散材料)假想的跗骨形态,这种关系受到了挑战。因此,袋犀兽科被置于一个亲缘关系不明的独立目——袋犀兽目。不过,许多作者仍基于牙齿相似性将袋犀兽科和南方有蹄目归为一类。在内蒙古晚古新世的苏崩遗址,我们根据跗骨的大小和丰富程度鉴定出了古袋犀兽的跗骨。与来自北美克拉克福克期、源自一具半关节连接骨架(还包括牙齿材料)的未发表的袋犀兽跗骨相比,这一鉴定结果得到了支持。跗骨形态显示出与睡鼠形的假异鼠有一定相似性,与跗骨形态保守的睡鼠类菱形兽极为相似。因此,袋犀兽科最好与亚洲非睡鼠类的睡鼠形类归为一类,我们认为它们在晚古新世扩散到了北美。