Siesjö B K, Memezawa H, Smith M L
Laboratory for Experimental Brain Research, University of Lund, Sweden.
Fundam Clin Pharmacol. 1991;5(9):755-67. doi: 10.1111/j.1472-8206.1991.tb00765.x.
Recent data suggest that brain damage in ischemia, hypoglycemia, and several other brain diseases is caused by excitotoxic mechanisms which are triggered by presynaptic release of glutamate and related excitatory amino acids, and which involve an abnormal postsynaptic influx of calcium into cells containing a high density of glutamate receptors. This contention is supported by results demonstrating reduction of infarct size in focal ischemia due to middle cerebral artery (MCA) occlusion, and amelioration of neuronal necrosis in hypoglycemic coma, by antagonist which block the NMDA type of glutamate receptor. These results underscore the pathogenetic role of calcium influx into energy-compromised cells since the NMDA receptor-linked ion channel has a high conductance to calcium. The issue has been clouded by the inability of NMDA antagonists to ameliorate brain damage due to cardiac arrest, or to forebrain ischemia in rats and gerbils. In these conditions, however, an AMPA receptor blocker (NBQX) has been found efficacious. These results demonstrate that the pathophysiology of ischemic lesions is different in the cardiac arrest type of ischemia and in lesions due to MCA occlusion, and demand an explanation of the differences in therapeutic response. Tentatively, the cardiac arrest type of ischemia is so dense that multiple calcium conductances are activated in the energy-deprived tissue, explaining why any drug which acts on only one of them (such as an NMDA antagonist) cannot prevent cellular calcium overload. Furthermore the ultimate brain damage, which is often conspicuously delayed, may be secondary to upregulation of synaptic efficacy, causing increased calcium cycling and calcium-related damage. In this situation, an AMPA receptor blocker may be efficacious because it blocks "fast" excitation and Na+ influx, an "upstream" event which causes "downstream" calcium influx via multiple pathways. In the perifocal ("penumbra") zone of a stroke lesion, the situation is different since depolarisation is initially moderate and/or intermittent. Furthermore, since ATP is still produced (albeit at a reduced rate) the problem is one of a disturbed pump/leak relationship. Then, blockade of a major calcium-carrying channel by NMDA receptor blockers, or of the trigger to depolarisation by an AMPA receptor antagonist, may improve the pump/leak relationship and carry cells in the penumbra over a critical period.
近期数据表明,缺血、低血糖及其他几种脑部疾病中的脑损伤是由兴奋性毒性机制引起的,这些机制由谷氨酸和相关兴奋性氨基酸的突触前释放触发,涉及钙离子异常地向含有高密度谷氨酸受体的细胞内的突触后流入。这一观点得到了以下结果的支持:通过阻断NMDA型谷氨酸受体的拮抗剂,可减小大脑中动脉(MCA)闭塞所致局灶性缺血的梗死灶大小,并改善低血糖昏迷中的神经元坏死。这些结果强调了钙离子流入能量受损细胞的致病作用,因为NMDA受体相关离子通道对钙离子具有高电导性。NMDA拮抗剂无法改善心脏骤停或大鼠和沙鼠前脑缺血所致的脑损伤,这使得该问题变得模糊不清。然而,在这些情况下,已发现一种AMPA受体阻滞剂(NBQX)有效。这些结果表明,心脏骤停型缺血和MCA闭塞所致病变中缺血性损伤的病理生理学不同,需要对治疗反应的差异作出解释。初步认为,心脏骤停型缺血非常严重,以至于在能量缺乏的组织中多种钙电导被激活,这就解释了为何仅作用于其中一种钙电导的药物(如NMDA拮抗剂)无法预防细胞内钙超载。此外,最终的脑损伤往往明显延迟,可能继发于突触效能上调,导致钙循环增加及与钙相关的损伤。在这种情况下,AMPA受体阻滞剂可能有效,因为它阻断“快速”兴奋和钠离子流入,而钠离子流入是一个“上游”事件,可通过多种途径导致“下游”钙离子流入。在中风病变的灶周(“半暗带”)区域,情况有所不同,因为去极化最初是适度的和/或间歇性的。此外,由于仍能产生ATP(尽管速率降低),问题在于泵/漏关系紊乱。那么,NMDA受体阻滞剂阻断主要的钙离子携带通道,或AMPA受体拮抗剂阻断去极化触发因素,可以改善泵/漏关系,并使半暗带中的细胞度过关键时期。