Nys G M S, van Zandvoort M J E, van der Worp H B, Kappelle L J, de Haan E H F
Psychological Laboratory, Helmholtz Institute, Utrecht University Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Brain. 2006 Aug;129(Pt 8):2148-57. doi: 10.1093/brain/awl199.
Patients with left-sided neglect frequently show repetitive behaviour on the ipsilesional side, such as re-markings on cancellation tasks or extensive elaboration on drawings. It is unclear whether these perseverative responses occur as a symptom of hemi-neglect or inattention in general, and/or whether they are related to anatomical brain correlates such as lesion location, lesion side or volume. In a first study, we examined the prevalence and neuropsychological correlates of perseverative responses in 206 subacute stroke patients and 63 healthy controls. Perseverative responses were considered present when there was at least one re-marking on the Star Cancellation, and both the degree and spatial distribution of re-markings were examined. A distinction was made between hemi-neglect and non-lateralized inattention. Spatial and verbal working memory were assessed with the Corsi Block Span and the Digit Span. Verbal and non-verbal executive function was assessed with the Visual Elevator and Letter Fluency. Stroke patients without inattention demonstrated re-markings that were related to executive performance, and the degree of perseveration was equally distributed across the sheet. Hemi-neglect patients but not patients with generalized inattention demonstrated more re-markings than controls, suggesting that a lateralized spatial attention bias triggers the perseverative responses. Patients with left and right hemi-neglect showed the same prevalence of perseveration, but the distribution of re-markings was more lateralized towards the ipsilesional side in patients with right-hemispheric stroke. The degree of perseveration in patients with hemi-neglect was related to the severity of the neglect. The goal of the second study on a subset of patients (n = 127) was to determine the neuroanatomical correlates of perseverative responses in the early phase of stroke. Lesion anatomy was administered by indicating involvement of frontal, parietal, temporal, occipital lobe, caudate nucleus, lenticular nucleus and/or thalamus. Lesion volume was calculated using a manual tracing technique. Lesion analyses indicated that perseverative behaviour is strongly associated with lesions involving the caudate nucleus or the lenticular nucleus, independent of lesion volume. The caudate nucleus was an important correlate of perseveration independent of the presence of hemi-neglect. No association was found between lesion side and perseverative responses, in contrast to previous studies. In conclusion, a stroke involving the basal ganglia and the presence of (left- or right-sided) hemi-neglect are two important associates of perseverative responses in the subacute phase of stroke.
左侧忽视患者常在患侧出现重复行为,如在删失任务中反复标记或在绘图时过度细化。目前尚不清楚这些持续性反应是半侧忽视或一般注意力不集中的症状表现,和/或它们是否与大脑解剖学相关因素如病变位置、病变侧别或体积有关。在第一项研究中,我们调查了206例亚急性卒中患者和63名健康对照者中持续性反应的发生率及其神经心理学相关因素。当在星形删失任务中至少有一处重复标记时,即认为存在持续性反应,并对重复标记的程度和空间分布进行了检查。对半侧忽视和非偏侧性注意力不集中进行了区分。采用Corsi方块跨度和数字广度评估空间和言语工作记忆。通过视觉电梯和字母流畅性评估言语和非言语执行功能。无注意力不集中的卒中患者表现出与执行功能相关的重复标记,且持续性程度在纸张上均匀分布。半侧忽视患者而非广泛性注意力不集中患者的重复标记比对照组更多,这表明偏侧性空间注意力偏差会引发持续性反应。左侧和右侧半侧忽视患者的持续性发生率相同,但右侧半球卒中患者的重复标记分布更偏向患侧。半侧忽视患者的持续性程度与忽视的严重程度相关。第二项针对部分患者(n = 127)的研究目的是确定卒中早期持续性反应的神经解剖学相关因素。通过指出额叶、顶叶、颞叶、枕叶、尾状核、豆状核和/或丘脑是否受累来评估病变解剖结构。使用手动追踪技术计算病变体积。病变分析表明,持续性行为与涉及尾状核或豆状核的病变密切相关,与病变体积无关。尾状核是与持续性相关的重要因素,与半侧忽视的存在无关。与先前研究不同,未发现病变侧别与持续性反应之间存在关联。总之,涉及基底神经节的卒中以及(左侧或右侧)半侧忽视的存在是卒中亚急性期持续性反应的两个重要相关因素。