Sorbonne Université, Institut du Cerveau-Paris Brain Institute-ICM, Inserm, CNRS, Paris, France.
Neurocenter, Luzerner Kantonsspital, 6000 Lucerne, Switzerland.
Brain. 2023 Apr 19;146(4):1467-1482. doi: 10.1093/brain/awac359.
In everyday life, information from different cognitive domains-such as visuospatial attention, alertness and inhibition-needs to be integrated between different brain regions. Early models suggested that completely segregated brain networks control these three cognitive domains. However, more recent accounts, mainly based on neuroimaging data in healthy participants, indicate that different tasks lead to specific patterns of activation within the same, higher-order and 'multiple-demand' network. If so, then a lesion to critical substrates of this common network should determine a concomitant impairment in all three cognitive domains. The aim of the present study was to critically investigate this hypothesis, i.e. to identify focal stroke lesions within the network that can concomitantly affect visuospatial attention, alertness and inhibition. We studied an unselected sample of 60 first-ever right-hemispheric, subacute stroke patients using a data-driven, bottom-up approach. Patients performed 12 standardized neuropsychological and oculomotor tests, four per cognitive domain. A principal component analysis revealed a strong relationship between all three cognitive domains: 10 of 12 tests loaded on a first, common component. Analysis of the neuroanatomical lesion correlates using different approaches (i.e. voxel-based and tractwise lesion-symptom mapping, disconnectome maps) provided convergent evidence on the association between severe impairment of this common component and lesions at the intersection of superior longitudinal fasciculus II and III, frontal aslant tract and, to a lesser extent, the putamen and inferior fronto-occipital fasciculus. Moreover, patients with a lesion involving this region were significantly more impaired in daily living cognition, which provides an ecological validation of our results. A probabilistic functional atlas of the multiple-demand network was performed to confirm the potential relationship between patients' lesion substrates and observed cognitive impairments as a function of the multiple-demand network connectivity disruption. These findings show, for the first time, that a lesion to a specific white matter crossroad can determine a concurrent breakdown in all three considered cognitive domains. Our results support the multiple-demand network model, proposing that different cognitive operations depend on specific collaborators and their interaction, within the same underlying neural network. Our findings also extend this hypothesis by showing (i) the contribution of superior longitudinal fasciculus and frontal aslant tract to the multiple-demand network; and (ii) a critical neuroanatomical intersection, crossed by a vast amount of long-range white matter tracts, many of which interconnect cortical areas of the multiple-demand network. The vulnerability of this crossroad to stroke has specific cognitive and clinical consequences; this has the potential to influence future rehabilitative approaches.
在日常生活中,来自不同认知领域的信息——例如视空间注意、警觉和抑制——需要在不同的大脑区域之间进行整合。早期模型表明,完全分离的大脑网络控制着这三个认知领域。然而,最近的研究主要基于健康参与者的神经影像学数据,表明不同的任务会导致同一高级别和“多需求”网络内的特定激活模式。如果是这样,那么关键基质的损伤会导致这三个认知领域的同时损伤。本研究的目的是批判性地检验这一假设,即确定能够同时影响视空间注意、警觉和抑制的网络内的局灶性中风损伤。我们使用数据驱动的自下而上方法研究了 60 名首次出现右侧、亚急性中风的未选择患者样本。患者接受了 12 项标准化神经心理学和眼动测试,每项测试都涉及一个认知领域。主成分分析显示,这三个认知领域之间存在很强的关系:12 项测试中有 10 项加载到第一个共同成分上。使用不同方法(即基于体素和束路径的损伤-症状映射、分离图)对神经解剖学损伤相关性进行分析,为严重损伤这一共同成分与上纵束 II 和 III 交界处、额斜束和内下额枕束损伤的关联提供了一致的证据。此外,涉及该区域的损伤患者在日常生活认知方面的损伤明显更严重,这为我们的结果提供了生态验证。还进行了多需求网络的概率功能图谱,以确认患者损伤部位与观察到的认知障碍之间的潜在关系,作为多需求网络连接中断的函数。这些发现首次表明,特定的白质交叉路口的损伤会导致所有三个被考虑的认知领域的同时崩溃。我们的结果支持多需求网络模型,该模型提出不同的认知操作依赖于相同的基础神经网络中的特定合作者及其相互作用。我们的发现还通过显示(i)上纵束和额斜束对多需求网络的贡献;以及(ii)一个关键的神经解剖交叉点,大量长距离白质束穿过该交叉点,其中许多束将多需求网络的皮质区域相互连接,扩展了这一假设。这个交叉点对中风的脆弱性有特定的认知和临床后果;这有可能影响未来的康复方法。