Arumugam Thiruma V, Magnus Tim, Woodruff Trent M, Proctor Lavinia M, Shiels Ian A, Taylor Stephen M
Laboratory of Neurosciences, National Institute on Aging Intramural Research Program, 5600 Nathan Shock Drive, Baltimore, MD 21224, USA.
Clin Chim Acta. 2006 Dec;374(1-2):33-45. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2006.06.010. Epub 2006 Jun 14.
Ischemia-reperfusion (I/R) injury occurs when a tissue is temporarily deprived of blood supply and the return of the blood supply triggers an intense inflammatory response. Pathologically, increased complement activity can cause substantial damage to blood vessels, tissues and also facilitate leukocyte activation and recruitment following I/R injury. Herein, previously published studies are reported and critically reviewed.
Medline and the World Wide Web were searched and the relevant literature was classified under the following categories: (1) Complement pathways; (2) The complement system and the inflammatory response; (3) Complement in ischemia-reperfusion injuries; and (4) Therapeutic approaches against complement in I/R injuries.
I/R injury is a common clinical event with the potential to seriously affect, and sometimes kill, the patient and is a potent inducer of complement activation that results in the production of a number of inflammatory mediators. Complement activation leads to the release of biologically active potent inflammatory complement substances including the anaphylatoxins (C3a and C5a) and the cytolytic terminal membrane attack complement complex C5b-9 (MAC). The use of specific complement inhibitors to block complement activation at various levels of the cascade has been shown to prevent or reduce local tissue injury after I/R. Several agents that inhibit all or part of the complement system, such as soluble complement receptor type 1 (sCR1), C1 inhibitor (C1-INH), C5a monoclonal antibodies, a C5a receptor antagonist and soluble CD59 (sCD59) have been shown to reduce I/R injury of various organs. The novel inhibitors of complement products may eventually find wide clinical application because there are no effective drug therapies currently available to treat I/R injuries.
当组织暂时缺血后恢复血液供应引发强烈炎症反应时,就会发生缺血再灌注(I/R)损伤。病理上,补体活性增加会对血管、组织造成严重损伤,还会促进I/R损伤后白细胞的活化和募集。本文报告并批判性地回顾了先前发表的研究。
检索了医学文献数据库(Medline)和万维网,相关文献分为以下几类:(1)补体途径;(2)补体系统与炎症反应;(3)补体在缺血再灌注损伤中的作用;(4)针对I/R损伤中补体的治疗方法。
I/R损伤是一种常见的临床事件,有可能严重影响甚至有时导致患者死亡,是补体激活的强效诱导剂,可导致多种炎症介质的产生。补体激活导致生物活性强效炎症补体物质的释放,包括过敏毒素(C3a和C5a)以及溶细胞末端膜攻击补体复合物C5b-9(MAC)。已证明使用特异性补体抑制剂在补体级联反应的各个水平阻断补体激活,可预防或减少I/R后的局部组织损伤。几种抑制全部或部分补体系统的药物,如可溶性补体受体1型(sCR1)、C1抑制剂(C1-INH)、C5a单克隆抗体、C5a受体拮抗剂和可溶性CD59(sCD59),已显示可减轻各种器官的I/R损伤。由于目前尚无有效的药物疗法治疗I/R损伤,新型补体产物抑制剂最终可能会在临床上得到广泛应用。