Beiderlinden Martin, Eikermann Matthias, Boes Tanja, Breitfeld Christa, Peters Jürgen
Universitätsklinikum Essen, Klinik für Anästhesiologie und Intensivmedizin, Hufelandstrasse 55, 45122 Essen, Germany.
Intensive Care Med. 2006 Oct;32(10):1627-31. doi: 10.1007/s00134-006-0262-y. Epub 2006 Jul 28.
To evaluate the effect of extracorporeal gas exchange (ECMO) on mortality of patients referred with severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS).
Prospective observational study in a university hospital ICU.
150 patients with severe ARDS.
Multimodal treatment with and without ECMO.
We treated 118 patients (78.7%) conservatively and 32 patients with ECMO. Patients in the ECMO group presented with significantly more severe disease (lung injury score 3.8+/-0.3 vs. 3.3+/-0.4; SOFA score 52+/-14 vs. 43+/-12; and SAPS score 14+/-3.3 vs. 10+/-3.5). Mortality in ECMO-treated patients tended to be higher than that with conservative treatment (46.9% vs. 28.8%, p=0.059). Multivariate logistic regression analyses with backward selection excluded ECMO as predictor of mortality (p=0.79). Independent predictors of mortality were age (odds ratio 1.044, 95% confidence interval 1.014-1.075, p=0.004), mean pulmonary artery pressure (1.082, 1.026-1.141, p=0.036), sequential organ failure assessment score (1.148, 1.018-1.294, p=0.024), and days of mechanical ventilation prior to referral (1.064, 1.008-1.123, p=0.025).
ECMO treatment does not predict mortality in patients with most severe ARDS.
评估体外气体交换(ECMO)对因严重急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)转诊患者死亡率的影响。
在一所大学医院重症监护病房进行的前瞻性观察性研究。
150例严重ARDS患者。
采用多模式治疗,部分患者接受ECMO治疗,部分患者未接受。
我们对118例患者(78.7%)进行了保守治疗,32例患者接受了ECMO治疗。ECMO组患者的病情明显更严重(肺损伤评分3.8±0.3对3.3±0.4;序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分52±14对43±12;简化急性生理学评分(SAPS)14±3.3对10±3.5)。接受ECMO治疗患者的死亡率倾向于高于保守治疗患者(46.9%对28.8%,p = 0.059)。采用向后选择的多因素逻辑回归分析排除ECMO作为死亡率的预测因素(p = 0.79)。死亡率的独立预测因素为年龄(比值比1.044,95%置信区间1.014 - 1.075,p = 0.004)、平均肺动脉压(1.082,1.026 - 1.141,p = 0.036)、序贯器官衰竭评估评分(1.148,1.018 - 1.294,p = 0.024)以及转诊前机械通气天数(1.064,1.008 - 1.123,p = 0.025)。
ECMO治疗不能预测最严重ARDS患者的死亡率。