Gascuel Olivier, Steel Mike
LIRMM, Montpellier, France.
Mol Biol Evol. 2006 Nov;23(11):1997-2000. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msl072. Epub 2006 Jul 28.
It is nearly 20 years since the landmark paper (Saitou and Nei 1987) in Molecular Biology and Evolution introducing Neighbor-Joining (NJ). The method has become the most widely used method for building phylogenetic trees from distances, and the original paper has been cited about 13,000 times (Science Citation Index). Yet the question "what does the NJ method seek to do?" has until recently proved somewhat elusive, leading to some imprecise claims and misunderstanding. However, a rigorous answer to this question has recently been provided by further mathematical investigation, and the purpose of this note is to highlight these results and their significance for interpreting NJ. The origins of this story lie in a paper by Pauplin (2000) though its continuation has unfolded in more mathematically inclined literature. Our aim here is to make these findings more widely accessible.
自发表具有里程碑意义的论文(齐藤和根井,1987年)《分子生物学与进化》中引入邻接法(NJ)以来,已过去近20年。该方法已成为从距离构建系统发育树最广泛使用的方法,原始论文已被引用约13000次(科学引文索引)。然而,“NJ方法试图做什么?”这个问题直到最近都有些难以捉摸,导致了一些不准确的说法和误解。不过,最近通过进一步的数学研究给出了这个问题的严格答案,本笔记的目的是强调这些结果及其对解释NJ的意义。这个故事的起源在于保普林(2000年)的一篇论文,尽管其后续发展是在更具数学倾向的文献中展开的。我们这里的目的是让这些发现更广泛地为人所知。