Horman Shane R, Svoboda Petr, Luning Prak Eline T
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104-6055, USA.
J Biomed Biotechnol. 2006;2006(1):32713. doi: 10.1155/JBB/2006/32713.
The hypothesis that RNA interference constrains L1 mobility seems inherently reasonable: L1 mobility can be dangerous and L1 RNA, the presumed target of RNAi, serves as a critical retrotransposition intermediate. Despite its plausibility, proof for this hypothesis has been difficult to obtain. Studies attempting to link the L1 retrotransposition frequency to alterations in RNAi activity have been hampered by the long times required to measure retrotransposition frequency, the pleiotropic and toxic effects of altering RNAi over similar time periods, and the possibility that other cellular machinery may contribute to the regulation of L1s. Another problem is that the commonly used L1 reporter cassette may serve as a substrate for RNAi. Here we review the L1-RNAi hypothesis and describe a genetic assay with a modified reporter cassette that detects approximately 4 times more L1 insertions than the conventional retrotransposition assay.
RNA干扰限制L1移动性这一假说似乎从本质上看是合理的:L1移动性可能具有危险性,而RNA干扰假定的靶标L1 RNA是关键的逆转录转座中间体。尽管这一假说貌似可信,但一直难以找到证据。试图将L1逆转录转座频率与RNA干扰活性改变联系起来的研究,因测量逆转录转座频率所需时间长、在相似时间段内改变RNA干扰所产生的多效性和毒性效应,以及其他细胞机制可能参与L1调控的可能性而受阻。另一个问题是,常用的L1报告盒可能是RNA干扰的底物。在此,我们综述L1-RNA干扰假说,并描述一种采用改良报告盒的遗传检测方法,该方法检测到的L1插入事件比传统逆转录转座检测方法多大约4倍。