Calderaro A, Bommezzadri S, Gorrini C, Piccolo G, Peruzzi S, Dettori G, Chezzi C
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Section of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Viale A. Gramsci, 14-43100 Parma, Italy.
Vet Microbiol. 2006 Nov 26;118(1-2):91-100. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2006.06.022. Epub 2006 Aug 1.
Rapid identification of porcine Brachyspira species is required in order to differentiate pathogenic from non-pathogenic species. The aim of our study was to compare a recently described genetic method based on polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP), nox RFLP-PCR assay, and three species-specific PCRs described previously in the literature with a 16S rRNA gene RFLP-PCR discriminatory reference assay (16S RFLP-PCR) for the identification of Brachyspira spp. of swine origin. In this study, 20 porcine spirochaetal strains were identified and compared to 33 reference strains by 16S RFLP-PCR and nox RFLP-PCR and three species-specific PCRs. RFLP-PCR methods showed concordant results for 47 strains and discordances for 6 strains (2 differently identified and 4 not revealed by nox RFLP-PCR). In our hands species-specific PCRs showed concordant results with 16S and nox RFLP-PCR for 43 strains and discordances for 10 strains (2 differently identified and 8 not amplified). The same results observed testing the 20 field-isolated spirochaetes were obtained for the corresponding porcine faecal samples. The detection limit was 10(2) -10(3) cells/g of faeces for 16S rRNA gene PCR and 10(4) cells/g of faeces for nox PCR. In our experience nox RFLP-PCR appeared successful for the speciation of B. hyodysenteriae reserving 16S RFLP-PCR for all other pathogenic and non-pathogenic Brachyspira species. Among the species-specific PCR assays tested only that for B. pilosicoli was useful in our hands.
为了区分致病性猪短螺旋体物种和非致病性物种,需要快速鉴定猪短螺旋体物种。我们研究的目的是将一种最近描述的基于聚合酶链反应(PCR)和限制性片段长度多态性(RFLP)的基因方法——nox RFLP-PCR分析,与文献中先前描述的三种物种特异性PCR,与用于鉴定猪源短螺旋体属的16S rRNA基因RFLP-PCR鉴别参考分析(16S RFLP-PCR)进行比较。在本研究中,通过16S RFLP-PCR、nox RFLP-PCR和三种物种特异性PCR对20株猪螺旋体菌株进行了鉴定,并与33株参考菌株进行了比较。RFLP-PCR方法对47株菌株显示出一致的结果,对6株菌株显示出不一致的结果(2株鉴定结果不同,4株在nox RFLP-PCR中未显示)。在我们的实验中,物种特异性PCR对43株菌株显示出与16S和nox RFLP-PCR一致的结果,对10株菌株显示出不一致的结果(2株鉴定结果不同,8株未扩增)。对相应的猪粪便样本进行检测时,对20株现场分离的螺旋体检测得到了相同的结果。16S rRNA基因PCR的检测限为每克粪便10(2)-10(3)个细胞,nox PCR的检测限为每克粪便10(4)个细胞。根据我们的经验,nox RFLP-PCR似乎成功地用于猪痢疾短螺旋体的物种鉴定,而16S RFLP-PCR则用于所有其他致病性和非致病性短螺旋体物种。在所测试的物种特异性PCR分析中,只有针对结肠短螺旋体的分析在我们的实验中是有用的。