Suppr超能文献

新斯的明和芬太尼添加于布比卡因用于术后硬膜外镇痛的镇痛活性比较。

Comparison of analgesic activity of the addition to neostigmine and fentanyl to bupivacaine in postoperative epidural analgesia.

作者信息

Tekin Selcen, Topcu Ismet, Ekici Neriman Z, Caglar Husnu, Erincler Tuna

机构信息

Guzelyurt Mah. Ingolstadt Cad, Anadolu Konutlari No:11, 45030, Manisa, Turkey.

出版信息

Saudi Med J. 2006 Aug;27(8):1199-203.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the analgesic and side effects of bupivacaine in combinations with neostigmine and fentanyl using patient-controlled-epidural analgesia (PCEA) methods in the postoperative period after abdominal hysterectomy.

METHODS

Seventy-five adult American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I-II patients, aged 18-65 years were included in the study. The study took place in Celal Bayar University Hospital, Turkey between 2003-2004 years. After preoperative epidural catheterization, the patients were operated under general anesthesia. After surgery, the patients were randomly allocated in a double-blinded manner to receive PCEA and divided into 3 groups: Group B: 0.125% bupivacaine, Group N: 0.125% bupivacaine plus neostigmine 4 ug kg-1 and Group F: 0.125% bupivacaine plus 1 ug kg-1 fentanyl solutions (10 mL loading dose, 5 mL bolus dose, 10 min lockout time, 30 mL in 4 hour limit). During the following 24 hours, hemodynamic parameters, pain score using visual analog scale, total analgesic consumption, additional analgesic requirements, sedation, satisfaction, nausea scores and probable side-effects were evaluated.

RESULTS

Total analgesic consumption was 143.7 +/- 7.2 mL in Group B, 123.4 +/- 6.2 mL in Group N and 106 +/- 8.3 mL in Groups F. The mean value in Group F was significantly lower than Group N and Group B (p<0.05), and was lower in Group N than Group B. Visual analog scale scores were lower in Group F than other groups (p<0.05). There were no differences in side effects between all groups.

CONCLUSION

Fentanyl and neostigmine by the PCEA method can be used safely for postoperative analgesia after gynecologic surgery. They increase analgesia quality and satisfaction without an increase in side effects.

摘要

目的

采用患者自控硬膜外镇痛(PCEA)方法,比较布比卡因联合新斯的明和芬太尼在腹式子宫切除术后镇痛效果及副作用。

方法

纳入75例年龄在18 - 65岁、美国麻醉医师协会身体状况分级为I - II级的成年患者。研究于2003 - 2004年在土耳其的切拉尔·贝亚尔大学医院进行。术前硬膜外置管后,患者接受全身麻醉手术。术后,患者以双盲方式随机分配接受PCEA,并分为3组:B组:0.125%布比卡因;N组:0.125%布比卡因加新斯的明4μg/kg;F组:0.125%布比卡因加1μg/kg芬太尼溶液(负荷剂量10mL,推注剂量5mL,锁定时间10分钟,4小时限量30mL)。在随后的24小时内,评估血流动力学参数、视觉模拟评分法疼痛评分、总镇痛药物消耗量、额外镇痛需求、镇静程度、满意度、恶心评分及可能的副作用。

结果

B组总镇痛药物消耗量为143.7±7.2mL,N组为123.4±6.2mL,F组为106±8.3mL。F组的平均值显著低于N组和B组(p<0.05),且N组低于B组。F组的视觉模拟评分低于其他组(p<0.05)。各组间副作用无差异。

结论

PCEA方法使用芬太尼和新斯的明可安全用于妇科手术后的镇痛。它们可提高镇痛质量和满意度,且不增加副作用。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验