Suppr超能文献

骨科手术后芬太尼/布比卡因与吗啡/布比卡因硬膜外输注的比较。

Comparison between epidural infusion of fentanyl/bupivacaine and morphine/bupivacaine after orthopaedic surgery.

作者信息

Berti M, Fanelli G, Casati A, Lugani D, Aldegheri G, Torri G

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, University of Milan, IRCCS H. San Raffaele, Italy.

出版信息

Can J Anaesth. 1998 Jun;45(6):545-50. doi: 10.1007/BF03012705.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare epidural infusions of bupivacaine-fentanyl and bupivacaine-morphine mixtures for postoperative pain relief after total hip replacement.

METHODS

In a prospective, randomized, double-blind study, 30 ASA physical status I-II patients undergoing total hip replacement were studied. Anaesthesia was provided by combined general/epidural anaesthesia without epidural opioids. Postoperative epidural analgesia was by continuous infusion of bupivacaine 0.125% (4 ml.hr-1) with either 0.05 mg.ml-1 morphine (morphine, n = 15) or 0.005 mg.ml-1 fentanyl (fentanyl, n = 15). Visual analogue pain scale (VAS), sedation (four-point scale), respiratory rate, pulse oximetry, rescue analgesics and supplemental oxygen were recorded by a blind observer at 1, 3, 6, 9, 12 and 24 hr after surgery.

RESULTS

No differences in pain relief, sedation, or non-respiratory side effects were observed between the two groups. Rescue analgesics were required in three patients in the fentanyl group (20%) and in two receiving morphine (13.3%) (P:NS). Two patients in the fentanyl group and three in the morphine group required oxygen due to SpO2 < 90% (P:NS). Both opioid/bupivacaine mixtures decreased haemoglobin oxygen saturation compared with preoperative values. The mean +/- SD SpO2 values measured at 3, 6, 12 and 24 hr were 94.4 +/- 1, 92.6 +/- 0.9, 92 +/- 0.8, and 92.8 +/- 1 in the morphine group, 95.3 +/- 0.5, 95 +/- 0.5, 94.6 +/- 1.2, and 95.6 +/- 1 in the fentanyl group (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Continuous epidural infusion of bupivacaine-morphine or bupivacaine-fentanyl mixtures provided similar pain relief. Patients receiving morphine showed a more marked decrease in SpO2 than those receiving fentanyl. However, the average SpO2 remained > 90% in both groups.

摘要

目的

比较布比卡因-芬太尼和布比卡因-吗啡混合液硬膜外输注用于全髋关节置换术后疼痛缓解的效果。

方法

在一项前瞻性、随机、双盲研究中,对30例美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)身体状况为I-II级且接受全髋关节置换术的患者进行了研究。麻醉采用全身/硬膜外联合麻醉,不使用硬膜外阿片类药物。术后硬膜外镇痛采用持续输注0.125%布比卡因(4 ml·hr-1),其中一组加入0.05 mg·ml-1吗啡(吗啡组,n = 15),另一组加入0.005 mg·ml-1芬太尼(芬太尼组,n = 15)。由一名盲法观察者在术后1、3、6、9、12和24小时记录视觉模拟疼痛量表(VAS)、镇静情况(四分制量表)、呼吸频率、脉搏血氧饱和度、补救性镇痛药和补充氧气的使用情况。

结果

两组在疼痛缓解、镇静或非呼吸副作用方面均未观察到差异。芬太尼组有3例患者(20%)需要补救性镇痛药,吗啡组有2例患者(13.3%)需要(P:无统计学意义)。芬太尼组有2例患者,吗啡组有3例患者因SpO2 < 90%需要吸氧(P:无统计学意义)。与术前值相比,两种阿片类药物/布比卡因混合液均降低了血红蛋白氧饱和度。吗啡组在3、6、12和24小时测得的平均±标准差SpO2值分别为94.4±1、92.6±0.9、92±0.8和92.8±1,芬太尼组分别为95.3±0.5、95±0.5、94.6±1.2和95.6±1(P < 0.05)。

结论

持续硬膜外输注布比卡因-吗啡或布比卡因-芬太尼混合液提供了相似的疼痛缓解效果。接受吗啡的患者SpO2下降比接受芬太尼的患者更明显。然而,两组的平均SpO2均保持> 90%。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验