Huthwaite Justin S, Martin Roy C, Griffith H Randall, Anderson Britt, Harrell Lindy E, Marson Daniel C
Department of Neurology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35233-7340, USA.
Behav Sci Law. 2006;24(4):453-63. doi: 10.1002/bsl.701.
This is a report of a two-year longitudinal study comparing healthy older adult subjects (n = 15) and mild Alzheimer's disease (AD) patients (n = 20) using an objective performance measure of medical decision-making capacity (MDC). Capacity to consent to medical treatment was measured using the Capacity to Consent to Treatment Instrument (CCTI). The CCTI is a psychometric measure that tests MDC using a series of four core capacity standards: S1 (evidencing/communicating choice), S3 (appreciating consequences), S4 (providing rational reasons), and S5 (understanding treatment situation), and one experimental standard [S2] (making the reasonable treatment choice). For each standard, mild AD patients were assigned one of three capacity outcomes (capable, marginally capable, or incapable) based on cut-off scores derived from control group performance. At baseline, mild AD patients performed equivalently with controls on simple standards of evidencing a choice (S1) and making the reasonable choice ([S2]), but significantly below controls on complex standards of appreciation, reasoning, and understanding (S3, S4, and S5) (p < 0.02). Control performance was stable over time on all capacity standards. At one-year follow-up, the mild AD group did not show significant decline from baseline on any capacity standard. However, at two-year follow-up the mild AD group showed significant declines from baseline on the three complex standards (S3, S4, and S5) (p < 0.02), and a trend on one of the simple standards (S1). Over the two-year period, the proportion of marginally capable and incapable outcomes in the AD group increased substantially for four of the five standards (S1, S3, S4, and S5). Performance on [S2] remained stable over time in the AD group.We conclude that mild AD patients have impaired MDC at baseline, and demonstrate significant additional decline on complex consent abilities of appreciation, reasoning, and understanding over a two-year period. AD patients also show emerging impairment on the simple consent ability of evidencing choice at two-year follow-up. Capacity outcome data reflect similar declines over time for these four consent standards. The findings suggest the value of early assessment and regular monitoring at two-year intervals of MDC in patients with mild AD.
这是一份关于一项为期两年的纵向研究的报告,该研究使用医学决策能力(MDC)的客观绩效指标,比较了健康的老年受试者(n = 15)和轻度阿尔茨海默病(AD)患者(n = 20)。使用治疗同意能力量表(CCTI)来测量同意接受医学治疗的能力。CCTI是一种心理测量工具,它使用一系列四个核心能力标准来测试MDC:S1(表明/传达选择)、S3(理解后果)、S4(提供合理理由)和S5(理解治疗情况),以及一个实验标准[S2](做出合理的治疗选择)。对于每个标准,根据从对照组表现得出的临界分数,为轻度AD患者分配三种能力结果之一(有能力、勉强有能力或无能力)。在基线时,轻度AD患者在表明选择(S1)和做出合理选择([S2])的简单标准上与对照组表现相当,但在理解、推理和理解(S3、S4和S5)的复杂标准上显著低于对照组(p < 0.02)。对照组在所有能力标准上的表现随时间保持稳定。在一年随访时,轻度AD组在任何能力标准上均未显示出与基线相比有显著下降。然而,在两年随访时,轻度AD组在三个复杂标准(S3、S4和S5)上显示出与基线相比有显著下降(p < 0.02),并且在一个简单标准(S1)上有下降趋势。在两年期间,AD组中勉强有能力和无能力结果的比例在五个标准中的四个(S1、S3、S4和S5)上大幅增加。AD组中[S2]的表现随时间保持稳定。我们得出结论,轻度AD患者在基线时MDC受损,并且在两年期间,在理解、推理和理解的复杂同意能力方面表现出显著的额外下降。AD患者在两年随访时,在表明选择的简单同意能力方面也出现了新的损害。能力结果数据反映了这四个同意标准随时间的类似下降。研究结果表明,对轻度AD患者进行MDC的早期评估和每两年定期监测具有重要价值。