Robert Jason Scott, Kirk Dwayne D
School of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA.
Am J Bioeth. 2006 Jul-Aug;6(4):W29-41. doi: 10.1080/15265160600843551.
As compared with conventional vaccine production systems, plant-made vaccines (PMVs) are said to enjoy a range of advantages including cost of production and ease of storage for distribution in developing countries. In this article, we introduce the science of PMV production, and address ethical issues associated with development and clinical testing of PMVs within three interrelated domains: PMVs as transgenic plants; PMVs as clinical research materials; and PMVs as agents of global health. We present three conclusions: first, while many of the ethical issues raised by PMVs are familiar, PMVs add a new dimension to old issues, and raise some novel issues for ethicists and policy-makers; secondly, it is premature to promise broad applicability of PMVs across the developing world without having demonstrated their feasibility; thirdly, in particular, proponents of PMVs as a solution to global health problems must, as a condition of the ethical conduct of their research, define the commercial feasibility of PMVs for distribution in the developing world.
与传统疫苗生产系统相比,植物源疫苗(PMV)据说具有一系列优势,包括生产成本以及在发展中国家储存和分发的便利性。在本文中,我们介绍了PMV生产的科学,并在三个相互关联的领域探讨了与PMV开发和临床试验相关的伦理问题:作为转基因植物的PMV;作为临床研究材料的PMV;以及作为全球健康媒介的PMV。我们得出三个结论:第一,虽然PMV引发的许多伦理问题并不陌生,但PMV为老问题增添了新维度,并为伦理学家和政策制定者提出了一些新问题;第二,在未证明其可行性的情况下,就承诺PMV在整个发展中世界具有广泛适用性还为时过早;第三,特别是,将PMV作为解决全球健康问题的支持者,作为其研究符合伦理的条件,必须确定PMV在发展中世界分发的商业可行性。