Suppr超能文献

额窦骨折的治疗:96例病例回顾

Management of frontal sinus fractures: a review of 96 cases.

作者信息

Gossman David G, Archer Sanford M, Arosarena Oneida

机构信息

Division of Otolaryngology, Department of Surgery, University of Kentucky Medical Center, 800 Rose Street, Lexington, KY 40536, USA.

出版信息

Laryngoscope. 2006 Aug;116(8):1357-62. doi: 10.1097/01.mlg.0000226009.00145.85.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The optimal treatment algorithm for frontal sinus fracture management remains ill-defined. The purpose of the study was to classify fracture types, review management methods, document associated injuries, and identify complications associated with various treatment options.

STUDY DESIGN

The authors conducted a retrospective chart review evaluating a 13-year experience with frontal sinus fracture management.

METHODS

Complete medical records of 96 frontal sinus fracture patients treated by the University of Kentucky Otolaryngology Service from 1990 to 2003 were reviewed.

RESULTS

The average patient age was 39 years. Fifty percent of the fractures involved the anterior table of the frontal sinus alone, and 50% involved both anterior and posterior tables. Forty-seven percent of the injuries were managed with observation, whereas 50% of patients underwent surgical repair. In the surgical group, 60% underwent open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF), 23% had a cranialization procedure, and 17% underwent sinus obliteration. The average length of follow up was 9 months. Complications occurred in 17% of the patients (5% in the nonsurgical group and 12% in the surgical group).

CONCLUSION

Our results support conservative management of nondisplaced or minimally displaced fractures based on the low complication rate seen in this series. Significant bone displacement can frequently be managed with simple ORIF. Complex fractures affecting the orbit or intracranial contents require cranialization or possibly obliteration. A subset of patients with suspected frontal sinus outflow obstruction can be considered for observation or simple ORIF with close follow up and endoscopic repair if outflow complications manifest.

摘要

目的

额窦骨折处理的最佳治疗方案仍不明确。本研究的目的是对骨折类型进行分类,回顾处理方法,记录相关损伤,并确定与各种治疗选择相关的并发症。

研究设计

作者进行了一项回顾性病历审查,评估了13年的额窦骨折处理经验。

方法

回顾了1990年至2003年肯塔基大学耳鼻喉科治疗的96例额窦骨折患者的完整病历。

结果

患者平均年龄为39岁。50%的骨折仅累及额窦前壁,50%累及前后壁。47%的损伤采用观察治疗,而50%的患者接受了手术修复。在手术组中,60%接受了切开复位内固定(ORIF),23%进行了颅骨化手术,17%进行了鼻窦闭塞术。平均随访时间为9个月。17%的患者出现并发症(非手术组为5%,手术组为12%)。

结论

我们的结果支持对无移位或轻度移位骨折进行保守治疗,基于本系列中观察到的低并发症发生率。明显的骨移位通常可以通过简单的ORIF进行处理。影响眼眶或颅内内容物的复杂骨折需要颅骨化或可能需要闭塞术。对于怀疑有额窦引流受阻的一部分患者,如果出现引流并发症,可以考虑进行观察或简单的ORIF,并密切随访以及内镜修复。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验