• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜手术与腰部背侧切开术治疗肾盂输尿管连接部梗阻的比较

Laparoscopy versus dorsal lumbotomy for ureteropelvic junction obstruction repair.

作者信息

Troxel Scott, Das Sakti, Helfer Eric, Nugyen Mike

机构信息

Division of Urology, University of Missouri, 1 Hospital Drive, Columbia, MO 65212, USA.

出版信息

J Urol. 2006 Sep;176(3):1073-6. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2006.04.072.

DOI:10.1016/j.juro.2006.04.072
PMID:16890693
Abstract

PURPOSE

Laparoscopic pyeloplasty offers similar success rates compared to open surgery. However, the advanced laparoscopic skills required may limit its widespread application. In select patients the dorsal lumbotomy approach can provide similar postoperative advantages to minimally invasive surgery. We analyze the perioperative management of laparoscopy vs dorsal lumbotomy for the repair of ureteropelvic junction obstruction.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In a retrospective review 13 patients who underwent dorsal lumbotomy pyeloplasty were compared to 19 patients who underwent laparoscopic pyeloplasty between 1998 and 2003. Preoperative confirmation of obstruction was obtained through excretory urogram or renal Lasix scan. All 13 patients undergoing dorsal lumbotomy had a dismembered pyeloplasty. Of the 19 laparoscopic cases 16 had a dismembered pyeloplasty and 3 had a Fenger procedure. Average followup was 12 months for the open group and 13.3 months for the laparoscopic group. Postoperative results were evaluated with excretory urogram or renal Lasix scan as well as subjective outcomes by the patients.

RESULTS

Operative time was slightly longer for the laparoscopy group at 231 minutes vs 200 minutes. Estimated blood loss and postoperative morphine requirements were also similar. Hospital stay was 3.3 days for the dorsal lumbotomy group compared to 2.4 for the laparoscopy group. The overall success rate for the laparoscopic group was 94.7% compared to 100% for the dorsal lumbotomy group. Each group had 1 complication, paresthesia of anterior/medial thigh that resolved by 6 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Our preliminary results show that a dismembered dorsal lumbotomy pyeloplasty is comparable to laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty with regard to intraoperative and postoperative hospital course.

摘要

目的

与开放手术相比,腹腔镜肾盂成形术成功率相近。然而,所需的先进腹腔镜技术可能会限制其广泛应用。对于特定患者,背侧腰椎切开术可提供与微创手术相似的术后优势。我们分析了腹腔镜手术与背侧腰椎切开术修复肾盂输尿管连接部梗阻的围手术期管理。

材料与方法

回顾性分析1998年至2003年间接受背侧腰椎切开术肾盂成形术的13例患者,并与19例接受腹腔镜肾盂成形术的患者进行比较。通过排泄性尿路造影或肾脏速尿扫描进行术前梗阻确认。接受背侧腰椎切开术的13例患者均进行了离断性肾盂成形术。19例腹腔镜手术病例中,16例进行了离断性肾盂成形术,3例进行了芬格手术。开放手术组平均随访12个月,腹腔镜组平均随访13.3个月。通过排泄性尿路造影或肾脏速尿扫描以及患者的主观结果评估术后结果。

结果

腹腔镜组手术时间稍长,为231分钟,而开放手术组为200分钟。估计失血量和术后吗啡需求量也相似。背侧腰椎切开术组住院时间为3.3天,腹腔镜组为2.4天。腹腔镜组总体成功率为94.7%,背侧腰椎切开术组为100%。每组各有1例并发症,即大腿前内侧感觉异常,6个月后缓解。

结论

我们的初步结果表明,离断性背侧腰椎切开术肾盂成形术在手术中和术后住院过程方面与腹腔镜离断性肾盂成形术相当。

相似文献

1
Laparoscopy versus dorsal lumbotomy for ureteropelvic junction obstruction repair.腹腔镜手术与腰部背侧切开术治疗肾盂输尿管连接部梗阻的比较
J Urol. 2006 Sep;176(3):1073-6. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2006.04.072.
2
Laparoscopic pyeloplasty for secondary ureteropelvic junction obstruction.腹腔镜肾盂成形术治疗继发性输尿管肾盂连接部梗阻
J Urol. 2003 Jun;169(6):2037-40. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000067180.78134.da.
3
Retrospective comparison of retroperitoneal laparoscopic versus open dismembered pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction.腹膜后腹腔镜与开放离断性肾盂成形术治疗肾盂输尿管连接部梗阻的回顾性比较
J Urol. 2006 Sep;176(3):1077-80. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2006.04.073.
4
Combination of laparoscopic and open procedure in dismembered pyeloplasty: report of 51 cases.腹腔镜与开放手术联合用于离断性肾盂成形术:51例报告
Chin Med J (Engl). 2006 May 20;119(10):840-4.
5
Which is better--retroperitoneoscopic or laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty in children?儿童后腹腔镜与腹腔镜离断性肾盂成形术哪种更好?
J Urol. 2007 Oct;178(4 Pt 2):1791-5; discussion 1795. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.03.200. Epub 2007 Aug 17.
6
Small incision combined with laparoscopy for ureteropelvic junction obstruction: comparison with retroperitoneal laparoscopic pyeloplasty.小切口联合腹腔镜治疗肾盂输尿管连接部梗阻:与后腹腔镜肾盂成形术的比较。
Chin Med J (Engl). 2009 Nov 20;122(22):2728-32.
7
Risk factors for recurrent ureteropelvic junction obstruction after open pyeloplasty in a large pediatric cohort.一大组儿科患者开放性肾盂成形术后输尿管肾盂连接处梗阻复发的危险因素
J Urol. 2008 Oct;180(4 Suppl):1684-7; discussion 1687-8. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.03.086. Epub 2008 Aug 16.
8
One-port retroperitoneoscopic assisted pyeloplasty versus open dismembered pyeloplasty in young children: preliminary experience.单孔后腹腔镜辅助肾盂成形术与开放离断式肾盂成形术治疗小儿肾盂输尿管连接部梗阻的初步经验
J Urol. 2010 Nov;184(5):2109-15. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2010.06.126. Epub 2010 Sep 18.
9
Comparison of flank, dorsal lumbotomy and laparoscopic approaches for dismembered pyeloplasty in children older than 3 years with ureteropelvic junction obstruction.比较肾盂成形术在 3 岁以上肾盂输尿管连接部梗阻患儿中经侧腹、背腰部切口和腹腔镜入路的效果。
J Urol. 2010 Jan;183(1):306-11. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.09.008.
10
Laparoscopic pyeloplasty versus antegrade endopyelotomy: comparison in 100 patients and a new algorithm for the minimally invasive treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction.腹腔镜肾盂成形术与顺行性肾盂内切开术:100例患者的比较及输尿管肾盂连接部梗阻微创治疗的新算法
Urology. 2005 Nov;66(5 Suppl):47-51. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2005.06.115.

引用本文的文献

1
Minimally invasive open dismembered pyeloplasty technique: Miniature incision, muscle-splitting dissection, and nopelvis reduction in children.微创开放性离断式肾盂成形术技术:小儿微小切口、肌间隙分离解剖及无肾盂复位术
Asian J Urol. 2019 Jul;6(3):290-293. doi: 10.1016/j.ajur.2018.08.001. Epub 2018 Aug 11.
2
Pyeloplasty in children: perioperative results and long-term outcomes of robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery compared to open surgery.儿童肾盂成形术:机器人辅助腹腔镜手术与开放手术的围手术期结果及长期疗效比较
Pediatr Surg Int. 2016 Jun;32(6):599-607. doi: 10.1007/s00383-016-3869-2. Epub 2016 Feb 1.
3
Comparison of Surgical Outcomes between Dismembered Pyeloplasty with or without Ureteral Stenting in Children with Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction.
小儿肾盂输尿管连接部梗阻行离断性肾盂成形术加或不加输尿管支架置入术的手术效果比较
Korean J Urol. 2012 Aug;53(8):564-8. doi: 10.4111/kju.2012.53.8.564. Epub 2012 Aug 16.
4
Laparoscopic versus open pyeloplasty: comparison of two surgical approaches- a single centre experience of three years.腹腔镜肾盂成形术与开放肾盂成形术:两种手术方式的比较——单中心三年经验
Indian J Surg. 2011 Aug;73(4):264-7. doi: 10.1007/s12262-011-0237-2. Epub 2011 Apr 26.
5
Minimal invasive pyeloplasty technique with vertical surgical approach: an alternative to laparoscopic pyeloplasty.经垂直手术入路的微创肾盂成形术技术:腹腔镜肾盂成形术的一种替代方法。
Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2012 Feb;28(2):100-4. doi: 10.1016/j.kjms.2011.10.029. Epub 2012 Jan 14.
6
Laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty: technique and results in 105 patients.腹腔镜离断式肾盂成形术:105 例患者的技术和结果。
World J Urol. 2010 Oct;28(5):615-8. doi: 10.1007/s00345-009-0483-0. Epub 2009 Oct 22.
7
Laparoscopic versus open pyeloplasty: Comparison of two surgical approaches -- a single centre experience of three years.腹腔镜肾盂成形术与开放肾盂成形术:两种手术方式的比较——单中心三年经验
J Minim Access Surg. 2008 Jul;4(3):76-9. doi: 10.4103/0972-9941.43091.
8
Is it always necessary to treat a ureteropelvic junction syndrome?是否总是需要治疗肾盂输尿管连接部综合征?
Curr Urol Rep. 2007 Mar;8(2):118-21. doi: 10.1007/s11934-007-0060-2.