• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

小切口联合腹腔镜治疗肾盂输尿管连接部梗阻:与后腹腔镜肾盂成形术的比较。

Small incision combined with laparoscopy for ureteropelvic junction obstruction: comparison with retroperitoneal laparoscopic pyeloplasty.

机构信息

Department of Urology, First People's Hospital affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.

出版信息

Chin Med J (Engl). 2009 Nov 20;122(22):2728-32.

PMID:19951604
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty is technically feasible for ureteropelvic junction (UPJ) obstruction although it is still challenged by its technical difficulty and time-consuming. In this study, we compared the initial results of retroperitoneal laparoscopic pyeloplasty versus a combined laparoscopic dissection and open reconstruction through a small incision in the treatment of UPJ obstruction.

METHODS

Sixty-four patients with primary UPJ obstruction underwent pyeloplasty: 32 patients underwent laparoscopic procedure and 32 patients underwent open assisted laparoscopic surgery including two steps, ie, laparoscopic dissection of the UPJ transperitoneally and then pyeloplasty via an extended small incision. The demographic data and intraoperative, postoperative and follow-up conditions of patients were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

Preoperative data were comparable in the patients of the two groups. The operative time was shorter (60.9 minutes vs 157.7 minutes, P < 0.0001) and the complication rate was lower (9.4% vs 31.3%, P < 0.05) in the open assisted group than in the laparoscopic group. The estimated blood loss (42.3 ml vs 47.8 ml), time to have normal diet (37.6 hours vs 33.8 hours), and hospital stay (6.7 days vs 6.2 days) were equivalent. The operative success rate was 97% for the open assisted group and 91% for the laparoscopic group.

CONCLUSIONS

The procedure of combined small incision with laparoscopy for UPJ obstruction is technically easy, and the results are promising. It can be used as an alternative to conventional procedures.

摘要

背景

腹腔镜离断肾盂成形术治疗肾盂输尿管连接部(UPJ)梗阻在技术上是可行的,但仍存在技术难度大和耗时的挑战。在本研究中,我们比较了后腹腔镜肾盂成形术与经小切口联合腹腔镜解剖和开放重建治疗 UPJ 梗阻的初始结果。

方法

64 例原发性 UPJ 梗阻患者接受肾盂成形术:32 例行腹腔镜手术,32 例行开放辅助腹腔镜手术,包括两步,即经腹膜外腹腔镜解剖 UPJ,然后通过延长小切口行肾盂成形术。比较两组患者的一般资料、术中、术后和随访情况。

结果

两组患者的术前资料无差异。开放辅助组的手术时间更短(60.9 分钟比 157.7 分钟,P<0.0001),并发症发生率更低(9.4%比 31.3%,P<0.05)。两组患者的估计出血量(42.3ml 比 47.8ml)、恢复正常饮食时间(37.6 小时比 33.8 小时)和住院时间(6.7 天比 6.2 天)相似。开放辅助组手术成功率为 97%,腹腔镜组为 91%。

结论

经小切口联合腹腔镜治疗 UPJ 梗阻的方法技术简单,效果令人满意。它可以作为传统方法的替代选择。

相似文献

1
Small incision combined with laparoscopy for ureteropelvic junction obstruction: comparison with retroperitoneal laparoscopic pyeloplasty.小切口联合腹腔镜治疗肾盂输尿管连接部梗阻:与后腹腔镜肾盂成形术的比较。
Chin Med J (Engl). 2009 Nov 20;122(22):2728-32.
2
Retrospective comparison of retroperitoneal laparoscopic versus open dismembered pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction.腹膜后腹腔镜与开放离断性肾盂成形术治疗肾盂输尿管连接部梗阻的回顾性比较
J Urol. 2006 Sep;176(3):1077-80. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2006.04.073.
3
Combination of laparoscopic and open procedure in dismembered pyeloplasty: report of 51 cases.腹腔镜与开放手术联合用于离断性肾盂成形术:51例报告
Chin Med J (Engl). 2006 May 20;119(10):840-4.
4
Retroperitoneal laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty: experience with 50 cases.腹膜后腹腔镜离断性肾盂成形术:50例经验
Urology. 2005 Sep;66(3):514-7. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2005.04.007.
5
Our experience with retroperitoneal and transperitoneal laparoscopic pyeloplasty for pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction.我们对腹膜后和经腹腹腔镜肾盂成形术治疗肾盂输尿管连接部梗阻的经验。
Eur Urol. 2005 Dec;48(6):973-7. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2005.08.004. Epub 2005 Sep 1.
6
Endopyeloplasty versus endopyelotomy versus laparoscopic pyeloplasty for primary ureteropelvic junction obstruction.肾盂内成形术与肾盂切开术及腹腔镜肾盂成形术治疗原发性输尿管肾盂连接部梗阻的比较
Urology. 2004 Jul;64(1):16-21; discussion 21. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2004.02.031.
7
Comparison of laparoscopic-assisted versus open dismembered pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction in infants: intermediate results.婴儿肾盂输尿管连接部梗阻的腹腔镜辅助与开放离断性肾盂成形术比较:中期结果
Urology. 2009 Oct;74(4):889-93. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2009.03.053. Epub 2009 Jul 22.
8
Laparoscopic pyeloplasty for secondary ureteropelvic junction obstruction.腹腔镜肾盂成形术治疗继发性输尿管肾盂连接部梗阻
J Urol. 2003 Jun;169(6):2037-40. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000067180.78134.da.
9
Laparoscopic pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction: outcome of initial 12 procedures.腹腔镜肾盂成形术治疗肾盂输尿管连接部梗阻:最初12例手术的结果
Int J Urol. 2004 Jul;11(7):449-55. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2042.2004.00830.x.
10
Which is better--retroperitoneoscopic or laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty in children?儿童后腹腔镜与腹腔镜离断性肾盂成形术哪种更好?
J Urol. 2007 Oct;178(4 Pt 2):1791-5; discussion 1795. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.03.200. Epub 2007 Aug 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Extracorporeal ureter handling during laparoscopic pyeloplasty: tips and tricks for beginners.腹腔镜肾盂成形术中的体外输尿管处理:初学者的技巧与窍门
Cent European J Urol. 2019;72(4):413-417. doi: 10.5173/ceju.2019.0022. Epub 2019 Dec 6.
2
Laparoscopic versus open pyeloplasty: a multi-institutional prospective study.腹腔镜肾盂成形术与开放性肾盂成形术:一项多机构前瞻性研究。
Cent European J Urol. 2018;71(3):342-345. doi: 10.5173/ceju.2018.1693. Epub 2018 Aug 20.
3
Mini incision open pyeloplasty - Improvement in patient outcome.小切口开放性肾盂成形术——改善患者预后。
Int Braz J Urol. 2015 Sep-Oct;41(5):927-34. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2014.0024.