Kao John, Lincoff A Michael, Topol Eric J, Madrid Antonio, J Price Matthew, Sawhney Neil, Teirstein Paul S
Division of Cardiology, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2006 Sep;68(3):352-6. doi: 10.1002/ccd.20735.
Percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) of coronary artery bypass grafts (CABG) are associated with worse outcomes compared with those of native coronary PCI. Little is known concerning the use of direct thrombin inhibition during CABG intervention. The objective of this report is to examine the safety and efficacy of bivalirudin with GPIIb/IIIa blockade inhibition in patients undergoing CABG PCI. GP IIb/IIIa use was provisional in REPLACE-2 and planned in REPLACE-1.
A post hoc analysis of patients undergoing CABG PCI in the REPLACE-1 and -2 trials was performed. In REPLACE-1, patients were randomized to either heparin or bivalirudin, with GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor use at the operator's discretion. In REPLACE-2, patients were randomized to heparin plus GP IIb/IIIa inhibition versus bivalirudin with provisional GP IIb/IIIa blockade. In both studies, randomized treatment groups were well matched. In unadjusted and logistic regression analysis, there were no significant differences in the combined endpoint of death, myocardial infarction, urgent revascularization, or major bleeding when patients were treated with either heparin or bivalirudin. Individual safety and efficacy endpoints were also similar. Minor bleeding was significantly reduced in patients treated with bivalirudin (14.8% vs. 22.7%, P = 0.037). Follow-up data available from the REPLACE-2 trial at 12 months found similar efficacy between groups with a trend towards decreased 12 month mortality in the bivalirudin vs. heparin groups (4.2% vs. 7.8%, P = 0.16).
CABG PCI using bivalirudin with provisional GPIIb/IIIa inhibition appears to provide similar safety and efficacy to heparin with GPIIb/IIIa inhibition.
与原发性冠状动脉经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)相比,冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)的PCI预后较差。关于CABG介入治疗期间直接凝血酶抑制的使用情况知之甚少。本报告的目的是研究比伐卢定联合糖蛋白IIb/IIIa受体拮抗剂(GPIIb/IIIa)在接受CABG PCI的患者中的安全性和有效性。在REPLACE - 2试验中,GP IIb/IIIa的使用是临时性的,而在REPLACE - 1试验中是计划性的。
对REPLACE - 1和 - 2试验中接受CABG PCI的患者进行事后分析。在REPLACE - 1试验中,患者被随机分为肝素组或比伐卢定组,GP IIb/IIIa抑制剂的使用由操作者决定。在REPLACE - 2试验中,患者被随机分为肝素加GP IIb/IIIa抑制剂组与比伐卢定联合临时性GP IIb/IIIa拮抗剂组。在两项研究中,随机治疗组匹配良好。在未调整和逻辑回归分析中,当患者接受肝素或比伐卢定治疗时,在死亡、心肌梗死、紧急血运重建或大出血的联合终点方面没有显著差异。个体安全性和有效性终点也相似。接受比伐卢定治疗的患者轻微出血显著减少(14.8%对22.7%,P = 0.037)。REPLACE - 2试验12个月时的随访数据显示,两组疗效相似,比伐卢定组与肝素组相比,12个月死亡率有下降趋势(4.2%对7.8%,P = 0.16)。
使用比伐卢定联合临时性GPIIb/IIIa抑制的CABG PCI似乎与使用GPIIb/IIIa抑制的肝素具有相似的安全性和有效性。