• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[晚期慢性肾衰竭患者肾功能间接估计值的准确性]

[Accuracy of indirect estimates of renal function in advanced chronic renal failure patients].

作者信息

Barroso S, Martínez J M, Martín M V, Rayo I, Caravaca F

机构信息

Servicio de Nefrología, Hospital Infanta Cristina, Badajoz.

出版信息

Nefrologia. 2006;26(3):344-50.

PMID:16892823
Abstract

Cockcroft-Gault (CG) and Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula are indirect estimates of renal function which have been widely accepted, though their accuracies have been scarcely validated in advanced chronic renal failure. The purpose of this study was to determine the accuracy (bias and precision) of these formulas in advanced CRF patients. The study group consisted of 99 unselected patients (62 +/- 15 years, 59 females) with advanced CRF. The glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was measured by Tc(99m) DTPA. Simultaneously, estimates of GFR by CG corrected for 1.73 m2 and MDRD (formula 7) were calculated. Agreement was evaluated graphically, bias was assessed by mean and median difference, and precision by median absolute differences and Bland-Altman plots. Mean GFR by DTPA, CG and MDRD were: 16.24 +/- 4.38 and 16.77 +/- 4.65 and 13.58 +/- 4.27 ml/min/1.73 m2, respectively. MDRD equation significantly underestimated GFR-DTPA (p = 0.0001). Both CG and MDRD correlated significantly with GFR-DTPA (R = 0.53 and R = 0.62, respectively). CG formula performed better than the MDRD equation with respect to bias (0.30 vs -3.24 ml/min/1.73 m2, p = 0.0001), and precision (0.58 vs. -3.11 ml/min/1.73 m2, p = 0.0001). By multiple linear regression, the best determinants of the error of the estimation by CC formula were: serum creatinine (beta = -0.58; p < 0.0001), age (beta = -0.62; p < 0.0001), and body mass index (beta = 0.26, p = 0.004), and by MDRD formula were: serum creatinine (beta = -0.38; p < 0.0001), and body mass index (beta = -0.20, p = 0.03). In conclusion, in unselected patients with advanced chronic renal failure, estimates by CC formula were more accurate than those obtained by MDRD formula. Serum creatinine was the main source of error of the estimation of GFR by both formulas, though demographic and anthropometric characteristics influenced as well on their accuracies.

摘要

Cockcroft-Gault(CG)公式和肾脏病膳食改良(MDRD)公式是对肾功能的间接估计,已被广泛接受,尽管它们的准确性在晚期慢性肾衰竭中几乎未得到验证。本研究的目的是确定这些公式在晚期慢性肾衰竭患者中的准确性(偏差和精密度)。研究组由99例未经挑选的晚期慢性肾衰竭患者组成(年龄62±15岁,女性59例)。采用Tc(99m)二乙三胺五乙酸(DTPA)测量肾小球滤过率(GFR)。同时,计算经1.73 m²校正的CG公式和MDRD公式(公式7)对GFR的估计值。通过图形评估一致性,通过均值和中位数差异评估偏差,通过中位数绝对差异和Bland-Altman图评估精密度。DTPA、CG和MDRD测得的平均GFR分别为:16.24±4.38、16.77±4.65和13.58±4.27 ml/min/1.73 m²。MDRD方程显著低估了GFR-DTPA(p = 0.0001)。CG和MDRD与GFR-DTPA均显著相关(R分别为0.53和0.62)。在偏差方面(0.30 vs -3.24 ml/min/1.73 m²,p = 0.0001)和精密度方面(0.58 vs. -3.11 ml/min/1.73 m²,p = 0.0001),CG公式比MDRD方程表现更好。通过多元线性回归,CG公式估计误差的最佳决定因素为:血清肌酐(β = -0.58;p < 0.0001)、年龄(β = -0.62;p < 0.0001)和体重指数(β = 0.26,p = 0.004),而MDRD公式的为:血清肌酐(β = -0.38;p < 0.0001)和体重指数(β = -0.20,p = 0.03)。总之,在未经挑选的晚期慢性肾衰竭患者中,CG公式的估计比MDRD公式更准确。血清肌酐是两个公式估计GFR误差的主要来源,尽管人口统计学和人体测量学特征也会影响其准确性。

相似文献

1
[Accuracy of indirect estimates of renal function in advanced chronic renal failure patients].[晚期慢性肾衰竭患者肾功能间接估计值的准确性]
Nefrologia. 2006;26(3):344-50.
2
GFR prediction using the MDRD and Cockcroft and Gault equations in patients with end-stage renal disease.使用MDRD方程以及Cockcroft和Gault方程对终末期肾病患者的肾小球滤过率进行预测。
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2005 Nov;20(11):2394-401. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfi076. Epub 2005 Aug 22.
3
Estimation of renal function in subjects with normal serum creatinine levels: influence of age and body mass index.血清肌酐水平正常受试者的肾功能评估:年龄和体重指数的影响
Am J Kidney Dis. 2005 Aug;46(2):233-41. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2005.05.011.
4
[Differences between the glomerular filtration rate estimated by the MDRD equation and the measurement of creatinine and urea clearance in unselected patients with terminal renal insufficiency].[MDRD方程估算的肾小球滤过率与未选择的终末期肾功能不全患者肌酐和尿素清除率测定值之间的差异]
Nefrologia. 2002;22(5):432-7.
5
[The Cockcroft-Gault equation is better than MDRD equation to estimate the glomerular filtration rate in patients with advanced chronic renal failure].对于晚期慢性肾衰竭患者,Cockcroft-Gault方程在估算肾小球滤过率方面优于MDRD方程。
Nefrologia. 2007;27(3):313-9.
6
Assessing glomerular filtration rate in healthy Indian adults: a comparison of various prediction equations.评估健康印度成年人的肾小球滤过率:各种预测方程的比较。
J Nephrol. 2005 May-Jun;18(3):257-61.
7
Cockcroft-Gault formula is biased by body weight in diabetic patients with renal impairment.对于肾功能损害的糖尿病患者,Cockcroft-Gault公式受体重影响存在偏差。
Metabolism. 2006 Jan;55(1):108-12. doi: 10.1016/j.metabol.2005.07.014.
8
Predictive performance of the modification of diet in renal disease and Cockcroft-Gault equations for estimating renal function.肾脏疾病饮食改良方程和Cockcroft-Gault方程对估算肾功能的预测性能。
J Am Soc Nephrol. 2005 Mar;16(3):763-73. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2004070549. Epub 2005 Jan 19.
9
What is the most appropriate formula to use in estimating glomerular filtration rate in adult Arabs without kidney disease?在估算无肾脏疾病的成年阿拉伯人肾小球滤过率时,最适宜使用的公式是什么?
Ren Fail. 2008;30(2):205-8. doi: 10.1080/08860220701810554.
10
Performance of the Cockcroft-Gault and modification of diet in renal disease equations in estimating GFR in ill hospitalized patients.考克饶夫-高尔特公式及肾脏病饮食改良公式在评估住院患者肾小球滤过率中的表现。
Am J Kidney Dis. 2005 Aug;46(2):242-52. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2005.04.023.

引用本文的文献

1
Reply to 'Strengths and limitations of estimated and measured GFR'.对“估算和测量的肾小球滤过率的优势与局限性”的回复
Nat Rev Nephrol. 2019 Dec;15(12):785-786. doi: 10.1038/s41581-019-0214-8.