• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

台湾集集地震后的灾害管理。

Disaster management following the Chi-Chi earthquake in Taiwan.

作者信息

Chan Yu-Feng, Alagappan Kumar, Gandhi Arpita, Donovan Colleen, Tewari Malti, Zaets Sergey B

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Division of Emergency Medicine, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey, Newark, New Jersey, USA.

出版信息

Prehosp Disaster Med. 2006 May-Jun;21(3):196-202. doi: 10.1017/s1049023x00003678.

DOI:10.1017/s1049023x00003678
PMID:16892885
Abstract

The earthquake that occurred in Taiwan on 21 September 1999 killed >2,000 people and severely injured many survivors. Despite the large scale and sizeable impact of the event, a complete overview of its consequences and the causes of the inadequate rescue and treatment efforts is limited in the literature. This review examines the way different groups coped with the tragedy and points out the major mistakes made during the process. The effectiveness of Taiwan's emergency preparedness and disaster response system after the earthquake was analyzed. Problems encountered included: (1) an ineffective command center; (2) poor communication; (3) lack of cooperation between the civil government and the military; (4) delayed prehospital care; (5) overloading of hospitals beyond capacity; (6) inadequate staffing; and (7) mismanaged public health measures. The Taiwan Chi-Chi Earthquake experience demonstrates that precise disaster planning, the establishment of one designated central command, improved cooperation between central and local authorities, modern rescue equipment used by trained disaster specialists, rapid prehospital care, and medical personnel availability, as well earthquake-resistant buildings and infrastructure, are all necessary in order to improve disaster responses.

摘要

1999年9月21日发生在台湾的地震造成2000多人死亡,许多幸存者受重伤。尽管该事件规模巨大、影响深远,但文献中对其后果以及救援和治疗不力原因的全面概述却很有限。本综述考察了不同群体应对这场悲剧的方式,并指出了过程中犯下的主要错误。分析了台湾地震后应急准备和灾害应对系统的有效性。遇到的问题包括:(1)指挥中心效率低下;(2)通信不畅;(3)民政部门与军方缺乏合作;(4)院前护理延迟;(5)医院不堪重负;(6)人员配备不足;(7)公共卫生措施管理不善。台湾集集地震的经验表明,精确的灾难规划、设立一个指定的中央指挥机构、改善中央与地方当局之间的合作、训练有素的灾难专家使用现代化救援设备、快速的院前护理以及医疗人员的可获得性,以及抗震建筑和基础设施,对于改善灾害应对都是必要的。

相似文献

1
Disaster management following the Chi-Chi earthquake in Taiwan.台湾集集地震后的灾害管理。
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2006 May-Jun;21(3):196-202. doi: 10.1017/s1049023x00003678.
2
Taiwan's medical response to the 921 'Chi-Chi' earthquake.台湾对921“集集”地震的医疗应对措施。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2011 Feb;37(1):13-8. doi: 10.1007/s00068-010-0026-9. Epub 2010 Jun 4.
3
Emergency medical assistance team response following Taiwan Chi-Chi earthquake.台湾集集地震后紧急医疗救援团队的响应
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2002 Jan-Mar;17(1):17-22. doi: 10.1017/s1049023x00000066.
4
Policy development in disaster preparedness and management: lessons learned from the January 2001 earthquake in Gujarat, India.灾害防备与管理中的政策制定:从2001年印度古吉拉特邦地震中汲取的经验教训。
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2003 Oct-Dec;18(4):372-84. doi: 10.1017/s1049023x00001345.
5
The public health response to the Chi-Chi earthquake in Taiwan, 1999.1999年台湾集集地震的公共卫生应对措施。
Public Health Rep. 2003 Nov-Dec;118(6):493-9. doi: 10.1093/phr/118.6.493.
6
Impact of climate change on disaster events in metropolitan cities -trend of disasters reported by Taiwan national medical response and preparedness system.气候变化对特大城市灾害事件的影响——台湾国家医疗应急和准备系统报告的灾害趋势。
Environ Res. 2020 Apr;183:109186. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2020.109186. Epub 2020 Jan 25.
7
The 1994 Northridge earthquake disaster response: the local emergency medical services agency experience.1994年北岭地震灾难应对:当地紧急医疗服务机构的经验
Prehosp Disaster Med. 1996 Jul-Sep;11(3):172-9. doi: 10.1017/s1049023x00042916.
8
A reassessment and review of the Bam earthquake five years onward: what was done wrong?五年后对巴姆地震的重新评估和回顾:哪些地方做错了?
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2009 Sep-Oct;24(5):453-60. doi: 10.1017/s1049023x00007317.
9
Prehospital communications during the Loma Prieta earthquake.洛马普列塔地震期间的院前通信。
Prehosp Disaster Med. 1995 Oct-Dec;10(4):225-31. doi: 10.1017/s1049023x00042084.
10
Lessons learned from the aeromedical disaster relief activities following the great East Japan earthquake.从东日本大地震后的航空医疗救援活动中吸取的教训。
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2013 Apr;28(2):166-9. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X12001835. Epub 2013 Jan 21.

引用本文的文献

1
The initial response of a local hospital in the earthquake zone during the February 6, 2023 Kahramanmaraş earthquakes: Injuries and challenges.2023 年 2 月 6 日土耳其卡赫拉曼马拉什地震中震区当地医院的初步反应:创伤与挑战。
Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2023 Nov;57(6):315-321. doi: 10.5152/j.aott.2023.23138.
2
2018 Taiwan Hualien Earthquake-Disaster Lessons We Learned in the Emergency Department of a Tertiary Hospital.2018年台湾花莲地震——我们在一家三级医院急诊科学到的灾害教训
J Acute Med. 2020 Dec 1;10(4):149-155. doi: 10.6705/j.jacme.202012_10(4).0003.
3
Factors affecting hospital response in biological disasters: A qualitative study.
影响医院应对生物灾害的因素:一项定性研究。
Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2020 Mar 16;34:21. doi: 10.34171/mjiri.34.21. eCollection 2020.
4
Taiwan's medical response to the 921 'Chi-Chi' earthquake.台湾对921“集集”地震的医疗应对措施。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2011 Feb;37(1):13-8. doi: 10.1007/s00068-010-0026-9. Epub 2010 Jun 4.
5
Mortality in the l'aquila (central Italy) earthquake of 6 april 2009.2009年4月6日意大利中部拉奎拉地震中的死亡率。
PLoS Curr. 2013 Jan 7;5:e50585b8e6efd1. doi: 10.1371/50585b8e6efd1.
6
Facilitators and obstacles in pre-hospital medical response to earthquakes: a qualitative study.地震现场医疗救援的促进因素和障碍:一项定性研究。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2011 May 16;19:30. doi: 10.1186/1757-7241-19-30.
7
Web 2.0 and internet social networking: a new tool for disaster management?--lessons from Taiwan.Web 2.0 和互联网社交网络:灾难管理的新工具?--来自台湾的经验教训。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2010 Oct 6;10:57. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-10-57.
8
Evidence-based ED Disaster Planning.基于证据的急诊科灾难预案
J Emerg Nurs. 2009 Jun;35(3):218-23; quiz 272-3. doi: 10.1016/j.jen.2008.03.002. Epub 2008 Jul 10.