Nisanoglu Vedat, Battaloglu Bektas, Ozgur Bulent, Eroglu Tamer, Erdil Nevzat
Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Inonu University, Turgut Ozal Medical Center, Malatya, Turkey.
Heart Surg Forum. 2006;9(6):E807-12. doi: 10.1532/HSF98.20061070.
There is still controversy about which vasodilator solution is best for storing radial artery (RA) conduits prior to coronary artery bypass grafting. The aim of this pilot study was to investigate how 4 different topical vasodilators applied during RA harvesting affect blood flow with the vessel in situ.
The subjects were 85 patients who underwent RA harvesting in preparation for coronary artery bypass grafting. Each case was assigned to 1 of 5 groups (17 RAs each) that were treated with different solutions: normal saline (control), nitroglycerin, diltiazem, papaverine, and adenosine. Standard clinical concentrations were used. The RA was partially harvested (pedicle attached proximally) and flow rates and hemodynamic parameters (mean arterial pressure, heart rate, central venous pressure) were recorded at 2 time points: (1) pretreatment and (2) after 5 minutes of immersion in 60 mL of treatment solution. Results were compared within and between groups, and post-treatment-to-pretreatment ratios were calculated for each variable.
There were no significant differences among the groups' mean pretreatment flow rates (P = .979) or mean posttreatment flow rates (P = .069). All except the diltiazem group showed a significant rise in mean flow rate from pretreatment to posttreatment. The mean posttreatment-to-pretreatment ratios for RA flow rate were 1.28 +/- 0.39 in the saline group, 1.85 +/- 0.72 in the nitroglycerin group, 1.31 +/- 0.48 in the diltiazem group, 1.37 +/- 0.64 in the papaverine group, and 1.23 +/- 0.42 in the adenosine group. Only the mean flow ratio in the nitroglycerin group was significantly higher than that in the saline group (P = .003). The mean flow ratios in the other vasodilator groups were not statistically different from the flow ratio in the saline group.
These preliminary results indicate that topical application of nitroglycerin solution effectively prevents perioperative spasm of the RA in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery. The authors recommend this solution for preparation and storage of RA grafts. Randomized controlled trials with power analysis will give more definitive information.
在冠状动脉旁路移植术前,哪种血管扩张剂溶液最适合用于保存桡动脉(RA)移植物仍存在争议。本初步研究的目的是调查在获取RA过程中应用4种不同的局部血管扩张剂如何影响原位血管的血流。
研究对象为85例因准备冠状动脉旁路移植术而进行RA获取的患者。每个病例被分配到5组中的1组(每组17条RA),分别用不同的溶液处理:生理盐水(对照组)、硝酸甘油、地尔硫卓、罂粟碱和腺苷。使用标准临床浓度。部分获取RA(近端附着蒂),并在两个时间点记录流速和血流动力学参数(平均动脉压、心率、中心静脉压):(1)预处理前;(2)浸入60 mL处理溶液5分钟后。对组内和组间结果进行比较,并计算每个变量的处理后与处理前的比率。
各组的平均预处理流速(P = 0.979)或平均处理后流速(P = 0.069)之间无显著差异。除地尔硫卓组外,所有组从预处理到处理后的平均流速均显著升高。RA流速的平均处理后与处理前比率在生理盐水组为1.28±0.39,硝酸甘油组为1.85±0.72,地尔硫卓组为1.31±0.48,罂粟碱组为1.37±0.64,腺苷组为1.23±0.42。只有硝酸甘油组的平均流速比率显著高于生理盐水组(P = 0.003)。其他血管扩张剂组的平均流速比率与生理盐水组的流速比率无统计学差异。
这些初步结果表明,局部应用硝酸甘油溶液可有效预防冠状动脉旁路手术患者围手术期RA痉挛。作者推荐该溶液用于RA移植物的制备和保存。进行有功效分析的随机对照试验将提供更确切的信息。